For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:15 am

Pardon my bad memory, but who was it that claimed Ruby's resurrection? Because it wasn't the person that rezzed Blake, DM, and me.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:15 am

Typhoon wrote:Pardon my bad memory, but who was it that claimed Ruby's resurrection? Because it wasn't the person that rezzed Blake, DM, and me.


thetrueoogabooga claimed her rez

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:17 am

May wrote:
Typhoon wrote:Pardon my bad memory, but who was it that claimed Ruby's resurrection? Because it wasn't the person that rezzed Blake, DM, and me.


thetrueoogabooga claimed her rez


Thanks, May.

Ooga claimed to be Snape, correct? What else did he claim to do?

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:18 am

Typhoon wrote:
May wrote:
Typhoon wrote:Pardon my bad memory, but who was it that claimed Ruby's resurrection? Because it wasn't the person that rezzed Blake, DM, and me.


thetrueoogabooga claimed her rez


Thanks, May.

Ooga claimed to be Snape, correct? What else did he claim to do?


Here's the post where ooga claimed Ruby's rez: click

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:24 am

So... Ooga had a night-stop and a resurrection (which we have only his word that it was a true resurrection, and not a rez-convert).

People are dying of POISON.

I still don't trust Ooga.

Vote: Ella
Vote: Ooga

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:29 am

Alex wrote:Other results went through, Regan.

Psh. Reading whole posts is for squares :P

I seem to specialize in selective reading. HAH!

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:31 am

Typhoon wrote:So... Ooga had a night-stop and a resurrection (which we have only his word that it was a true resurrection, and not a rez-convert).

People are dying of POISON.

I still don't trust Ooga.

Vote: Ella
Vote: Ooga


Ooga also didn't retract the vote on Fzun when s/he had been proved innocent. Vote Ooga? I don't know. Who said it was s/he that had a night stop? If he really is Snape, he wouldn't have one. If Ooga was Snape, I'll go out on a limb and just vote for them today. I'm bankin' on this, Typhoon. Be right.

Vote: Ooga

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:30 am

well then this is just stupid. I have people who actually know my role voting against me and they know it's pointless.

I might aswell reveal myself on the thread.

I'm Peeves the Poltergeist, the flip flopper who was responsible for getting Ginny-ROX AKed on night two. And seeing as I'm already dead I can't be executed. Now I find it absolutely idiotic that everyone is just following like sheep even when some people actually know my role. I even contacted Rubywinged early in the game so that someone wouldn't falsely accuse me such as now.
Considering all the rezzes, I would rather be trying to find out if there is a rez converter among us. One too many rezzes is just plain suspicious to me.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:36 am

Ella is innocent as far as I know, we've talked. If anyone wants my role, PM me.
Vote: Ooga
*le shrug*

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:08 am

Vote: 3lla
Vote: Ooga

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:26 am

Ella is lying, but I thought Ooga was innocent...

Vote: Ella
Vote: Ooga

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:33 am

fzun wrote:Ella is lying


*yawn*
well i guess we have to see what happens at execution then.... :roll:
Just don't go running around all confused after execution even when I said that executing me is pointless. You could be using this time to kill an OMT or whoever is controlling dementors.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:34 am

Vote: Ella
Vote: Ooga


I have no idea what's going on. Can anyone catch me up through PM? I'm a confirmed innocent due to the convert. :)

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:37 am

3lla wrote:
fzun wrote:Ella is lying


*yawn*
well i guess we have to see what happens at execution then.... :roll:
Just don't go running around all confused after execution even when I said that executing me is pointless. You could be using this time to kill an OMT or whoever is controlling dementors.


If you're not executed it will probably be because there are horcrux still floating around that haven't been destroyed yet :P

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 12:14 pm

Well, Ella just contradicted herself vs. something she sent me in PM. {I just double-checked, and this was not true -- I was confused about who ginnyrox was when I wrote this. Sorry.} People shouldn't assume that those who vote without giving a reason are just blindly following a bandwagon -- not all the game happens on-thread. Just because you PM someone a role doesn't mean they "know" your role -- people lie. Thanks for making me feel even better about my vote.

Now, Blake, why are you so sure that Snape wouldn't have a nightstop? The mechanism of action seemed very potiony. In addition, I was told in advance (not by ooga) that there would be some confusion that would cause lists not to work that night -- which is exactly what happened. Since then, both ooga and the person who told me have claimed it was ooga who caused that confusion. I know they could both be lying and covering for a third person, but if so, it was a well-coordinated lie (especially since I was in contact with both independently of one another). Plus, would a baddie have a nightstop? If it was an innocent (not ooga) who caused the nightstop, why wouldn't they come forward at least via PM to someone so that we'd know it was a lie?
Last edited by Siniri on Sun Jun 22, 2008 1:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Topic locked