For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:45 pm

But the day before, I asked for you, amongst other people, to contact me. You didnt.

Instead, you voted no execution, and that's extremely suspicious. That made me vote for you, and a Daykill attempt followed. Even more suspicious.

Plus, you should have explained WHY people shoudn't vote for you, instead of revenge voting. That may have triggered some unvotes and you could be saved.

Since this is pretty obvious, even to someone who has never played WW before, It made me and the rest of the players suspicious of you, AGAIN.

Plus, you survived execution. You need a pretty big shield for that. And baddies usually have BIG shields.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:49 pm

Roxas_X wrote:But the day before, I asked for you, amongst other people, to contact me. You didnt.

Instead, you voted no execution, and that's extremely suspicious. That made me vote for you, and a Daykill attempt followed. Even more suspicious.

Plus, you should have explained WHY people shoudn't vote for you, instead of revenge voting. That may have triggered some unvotes and you could be saved.

Since this is pretty obvious, even to someone who has never played WW before, It made me and the rest of the players suspicious of you, AGAIN.

Plus, you survived execution. You need a pretty big shield for that. And baddies usually have BIG shields.


Ah, about that day : I was away on a road-trip.
I voted no execution? Why? Because, I wanted to be neutral.

Why didn't I defend myself? I felt no use to, I doubt people would have unvoted even if I did defend. And why am I bothering to defend myself now?

You say "since this is pretty obvious", what is "pretty obivious"?

I survived execution, because someone raised my shield to 100%.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:05 pm

Not to add more fuel to the fire but Light was targeted for a day attack as well. It could just have been threatening to all baddies when you posted the list of people that had been confirmed and an order to send your vote in or be thought of as suspicious. There's no need to be jumping down the throat at a brand new player for not defending himself when he had close to twice the amount of votes needed to evict him when he finally got back on it was close to eviction time and there was no way enough people would've been on enough to save him. And he voted for you because you voted for him because he didnt pm you. Im not saying don't vote for Light but give him a break. He was basically framed evil or not out of pure chance and there's no need for us to jump at his throat.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:26 pm

Light wrote:
Roxas_X wrote:But the day before, I asked for you, amongst other people, to contact me. You didnt.

Instead, you voted no execution, and that's extremely suspicious. That made me vote for you, and a Daykill attempt followed. Even more suspicious.

Plus, you should have explained WHY people shoudn't vote for you, instead of revenge voting. That may have triggered some unvotes and you could be saved.

Since this is pretty obvious, even to someone who has never played WW before, It made me and the rest of the players suspicious of you, AGAIN.

Plus, you survived execution. You need a pretty big shield for that. And baddies usually have BIG shields.


Ah, about that day : I was away on a road-trip.
I voted no execution? Why? Because, I wanted to be neutral.

Why didn't I defend myself? I felt no use to, I doubt people would have unvoted even if I did defend. And why am I bothering to defend myself now?

You say "since this is pretty obvious", what is "pretty obivious"?

I survived execution, because someone raised my shield to 100%.


You could have warned about it, you know. >.<
Plus, I asked for you to contact me, why didn't you? That adds up suspicion.

You ARE defending, Light. XD

Huh?

Oh, right! Silly me!. *slaps forehead*
I didnt know the shield boost was that big, though. >.<.

Oh, and Penguin, it was an innocent who did that daykill attempt, and that person contacted me about it. Plus, someone could have an execution stop.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:34 pm

Yeah, that was my day kill that I gained from the SP I picked up. Kind of useless, I guess.

The most suspicious thing is that you have YET to give a confirmed innocent your role. If you were innocent, I don't see why you wouldn't have done this by now.

I also think it's interesting that when you don't die, one of the baddie teams either doesn't kill or misses completely. It may be that avoiding a day kill or having an increased shills is one of the powers that baddie team has that replaces a kill? I don't know, just speculating.

As, you still have not given any actual evidence of your proof-

Vote: Light

Sorry.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:46 pm

I am not defending Light

Vote: Light

I was just saying at least give him a chance to explain himself ( or try) I doubt there's anything he can say to dissuade us but we should let him at least try. I just don't like it when people dont get atleast a chance to explain themselves. Oh and I didnt know that matterbug had gotten a kill. But it sounds like Light has already made an attempt at a point but it didnt hold any water but regardless I just wanted to point out why I said what I did.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:01 pm

I agree that everyone should be given a chance to defend themselves. Light just... well, doesn't. That and he not giving his role to confirmed innocents bring up a lot of suspicion.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:14 pm

Current vote count:

Light - 4 (Roxas, Dyl, Matterbug, Penguin)

11 alive, 6 votes needed to execute.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:08 pm

Vote: Light

I love arguments! :lol:

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:23 pm

VOTE: Samuel L. Chang Ligt

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:20 pm

Vote: Light

I am without a doubt sure he is evil, and not just because he won't give a defense or give his role to confirm innocents. *shrug*

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:23 pm

Vote: Light

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 8:31 pm

Vote: Susannahmio

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:54 pm

Vote: Light

You... you... you SHINE! ;-;

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Fri Aug 24, 2007 11:26 pm

Current vote count:

Light - 9 (Roxas, Dyl, Matterbug, Penguin, Susannahmio, TOSO, Twiz, Miyu, Hansy)
Susannahmio - 1 (Light)

11 alive, 6 votes needed to execute.

:o Almost everyone voted!
Topic locked