Wed Oct 13, 2004 4:59 pm
"(The website is) luring young people into gambling without . . . appropriate education and appropriate safeguards
Wed Oct 13, 2004 5:00 pm
autechre wrote:hallucinating wrote:I'm pretty sure they've taken down all the betting games temporarily, until they can put the age restriction on them. They'll be back eventually.
Though I agree that the Australian media is jumping on this bandwagon and trying to make the 'scandal' into something huge. Which is unnecessary. Perhaps they had nothing better to write about.
yeh it was. the only thing to get more publicity was deltas goodrems new underwear range.
Wed Oct 13, 2004 5:24 pm
Outraged Neopets Fans Strike Back!
After discovering that they have been banned from playing "luck-chance" games on Neopets, enraged Australian Neopets players send in inflammatory letters, pointing out that the gambling aspects of the sites are "educational" and should be unbanned.
One Neopets player claimed that she did not develop an addiction to gambling due to the "luck-chance" games on the site, yet was upset enough to write in a long letter asking the press to retract their "flawed" comments and reopen the gambling games to everyone.
Another Neopets player got many Australian players to sign an online petition so that they could have their gambling games resumed.
This goes to show how deep-rooted the obsession of Neopets is in the players, and how much influence the site can exert on undiscerning youngsters. We believe, more firmly than ever, that Neopets is a powerful negative influence towards players, and can seriously affect the mindsets of innocent children.
Wed Oct 13, 2004 5:28 pm
Wed Oct 13, 2004 5:36 pm
Qanda wrote:I can almost imagine how the Australian press will take it when loyal Neopets fans start signing petitions and sending in complaint letters. The following hypothetical news article is totally fictitious:Outraged Neopets Fans Strike Back!
After discovering that they have been banned from playing "luck-chance" games on Neopets, enraged Australian Neopets players send in inflammatory letters, pointing out that the gambling aspects of the sites are "educational" and should be unbanned.
One Neopets player claimed that she did not develop an addiction to gambling due to the "luck-chance" games on the site, yet was upset enough to write in a long letter asking the press to retract their "flawed" comments and reopen the gambling games to everyone.
Another Neopets player got many Australian players to sign an online petition so that they could have their gambling games resumed.
This goes to show how deep-rooted the obsession of Neopets is in the players, and how much influence the site can exert on undiscerning youngsters. We believe, more firmly than ever, that Neopets is a powerful negative influence towards players, and can seriously affect the mindsets of innocent children.
I am fully on the side of the Neopets players, in case you didn't know. This post is pure sarcasm.
Wed Oct 13, 2004 5:57 pm
Heck, you could probably call Pokemon Cards gambling, but even kids that were like, 7, played with those.
Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:02 pm
Kitten Medli wrote:Heck, you could probably call Pokemon Cards gambling, but even kids that were like, 7, played with those.
How?![]()
Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:04 pm
Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:22 pm
meowth1982 wrote:I find it intresting that pixels and fake money is making this much of an uproar. My dorm room is open if any Aussies need to make an escape to the US
Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:27 pm
jellyoflight wrote:Kitten Medli wrote:Heck, you could probably call Pokemon Cards gambling, but even kids that were like, 7, played with those.
How?
Well, when you play for keeps you're gambling your card and if you win you get the other, and if you lose you lose it. And some -really- super-nitpicky people could interpret this as gambling
Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:48 pm
Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:06 pm
Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:54 pm
Wed Oct 13, 2004 9:08 pm
Wed Oct 13, 2004 9:17 pm