For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:03 pm

Twinkle wrote:Okay, I'll change my wording but the more you try to put me off voting for you, the more I will suspect you. There is no other way to separate the baddies from the good so sorry if you're good, you're just acting strangely, that's all.


That's true. I am acting strangely as this is the first time a crowd has ever pinpointed me in the Werewolf games. Sorry if I'm a bit testy, I hate being the center of attention for bad reasons.

Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:04 pm

OK. Since we haven't been told we can't vote for no-one, I shall vote for no-one because even though I have my suspicions about Ammer, I'm unsure. So:

Vote: No-one

Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:15 pm

I'm not going to vote for Ammer, because I am positive he's innocent. I'm an innocent myself. It's up to you guys to believe us or not. (Watch as both of us are targeted by mafia/werewolves/etc tonight ><)

Again I'm not going to vote, because I don't see anyone as a clear target. :/ There's no proof anyone is anything, and I hate bandwagoning.

Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:19 pm

Nobody seems really suspicious to me, so I'm not going to vote yet. I don't think we should vote without good reasons, since we can't afford to lose anymore people with important roles this early in the game.

Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:58 pm

I don't know who to believe Ammer or Jelly. I'll wait and see who I'll vote for.

Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:03 pm

Hmm, this is still going on? I seriously doubt that we are going to get anywhere if we start pointing fingers and putting blame on others for reasons outside of the game. I don't think any of these types of actions are suspicious (well I suppose all are in their own right). I think we should look more to the people that are being quiet, or possibly the people that are active, but are putting themselves out of the spotlight. *shrugs* Just a thought. Sure beats arguing with each other doesn't it?

Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:07 pm

I must depart now, lest I be late to rouse in the morning. I shall not vote, for one knows not who to suspect.

I apologize, yet I must declare my inaction to vote.

Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:07 pm

I come home from school and we have twice as many pages as this morning o.O

I doubt we'll get an execution in tonight because most of us have voted for no one. I won't vote because A) I don't know who to vote for, B) me voting will have no effect on whether we have an execution or not and C) I don't even think we can actually do the whole "Vote: Nobody" thing.

Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:29 pm

I'm so sorry guys for being inactive. But with sleep and school and all... *sigh*

I just think we should stop an execution this time and wait until tomorrow, when we might know more. Lots of us are just guessing and I don't think we really want to lose another innocent.

Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:34 pm

Ammer- saying vote: nobody its just not counted. I'll just skip over it :P

All- you do not need to "unvote" a nobody.

Urthdigger- please bold your votes.

All- I get home from school at ~2:20. If i can get access to a computer... I'll try to do it... but without a computerscience class this year... it makes it much harder for me.

VOTES:

Ammer-3 vote: Jellyoflight, Twinkle, Shadowfare

Okamotosan18- 1 vote: Wind
o_0- 1 vote: Urthdigger

36 people are playing.
50% = 18 votes majority.

Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:39 pm

vote: jellyoflight

Because once again it's the morning, only 6 minutes later than yesterday and I've already changed into my school uniform.

Jelly, why Ammer?
Ammer, why unvote Jelly?

Another reason that is really not solid for this is that why are there 3 people voting for Ammer now? It's interesting to see that only three has chosen Ammer to vote for and no one else did.

I hope I'm not dead; if I'm dead, then there may be a chance of them killing me.

Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:43 pm

_jaye_ wrote:Ammer, why unvote Jelly?


Because of the fact I thought that I voted for Jelly to keep myself alive. It was a selfish vote. But now that I think about, Twinkle didn't change her vote but Ixistant did. But that could be a mere coincidence.

Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:47 pm

Argh, I hate school and homework. I'll only get to post around this time and a bit after the eliminations, if I'm lucky.

PuppyLover wrote:It doesn't sound like there are Serial Killers again because it was a knife. Does anyone know what other kind of bad guys have been in WW games?


Maybe a thief? Jeweled daggers seem like something theives might have.

And my vote-- VOTE: Nobody since I have no idea as to who's who yet and I don't want people to blame me for voting them (see what happened to gundam)

Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:47 pm

Sorry to release a can of worms, however...

I just got a PM. Someone had used something to somehow get Scott to PM me. I got asked whether I was a baddie. If anyone knows any details, or has any speculation, it would be helpful.

It is clear that this isn't any dreaming role, because everyone would say "No", I think that it may be dependant upon whether or not I was honest, however, I said No, because I didn't want anyone suspecting me.

Perhaps if anyone gets a similar PM, you could PM me, and we could experiment on different responses.

Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:51 pm

That's really odd Matt... I haven't had a PM like that. Maybe Scott forgot what role he gave you. :lol:

Anyway, I'm off to bed now. I'll check up on this thread tomorrow, til then good luck everyone! (well the innocents anyway! :P )
Topic locked