Difference between revisions of "Talk:Xweetok"

From NeoDex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
('anatomy' section...)
Line 3: Line 3:


==Anatomy Section==
==Anatomy Section==
The anatomy section - first added [http://pinkpt.com/neodex/index.php?title=Xweetok&oldid=22833 here] - seems to mainly be a bit of fan-fiction and shamelessly ripped from [http://www.neopets.com/ntimes/index.phtml?section=399424&week=341 the NT article it mentions], so I'm thinking that it should probably be removed...? --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 16:22, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


The anatomy section - first added [http://pinkpt.com/neodex/index.php?title=Xweetok&oldid=22833 here] - seems to mainly be a bit of fan-fiction and shamelessly ripped from [http://www.neopets.com/ntimes/index.phtml?section=399424&week=341 the NT article it mentions], so I'm thinking that it should probably be removed...? --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 16:22, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
:Yes, it probably should if that is the case. I actually thought it was from Neopets Magazine, but I guess not. BAH! :P --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 21:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:58, 9 August 2008

Source for new info

This was all added by Wolfguy on March 14, 2007...

An average of about 17 of these cute pets are being born every minute! About 29 thousand per day!

The article can show an average of neopets being created during a certain time frame, and perhaps a percentage of how many there are on a certain time frame versus when they were created. until a real number is given which shows correct and proper data, i don't feel right in showing this.

Xweetoks are also popular in the Neopian Times and are used as a symbol of being carefree, comical, and creative.

the Neopian Times are fan fiction to begin with, and the Xweetok can be shared in any way a user wants. this can still perhaps be kept in, but only with a a large showing of proof (that they are popular and are used as mentioned). --Jacob 17:57, 14 Mar 2007 (CST)

Anatomy Section

The anatomy section - first added here - seems to mainly be a bit of fan-fiction and shamelessly ripped from the NT article it mentions, so I'm thinking that it should probably be removed...? --Macbeth 16:22, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it probably should if that is the case. I actually thought it was from Neopets Magazine, but I guess not. BAH! :P --Jacob 21:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)