For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:11 am

That was...weird.

I sense a hidden power being used.

In any case, we should try and get a majority on 3lla if she is in fact evil as Alex stated.

Vote: 3lla

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:12 am

Dumbledore? Ron? Mcgonagall?

Who had that light thingy?

Vote: 3lla

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:14 am

o.o Well then.

Vote: Ella

Dumbledore had it in the books. Whoever was responsible for it, mind letting me know? :)

(Pst, McGonagall's dead).

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:15 am

Alex wrote:o.o Well then.

Vote: Ella

Dumbledore had it in the books. Whoever was responsible for it, mind letting me know? :)

(Pst, McGonagall's dead).

Oh, right. But didn't Ron have it in the 7th book?

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:19 am

Blake wrote:
Alex wrote:o.o Well then.

Vote: Ella

Dumbledore had it in the books. Whoever was responsible for it, mind letting me know? :)

(Pst, McGonagall's dead).

Oh, right. But didn't Ron have it in the 7th book?


Wasn't me.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:20 am

Yes, Ron had it in the last book -- it also could be used to eavesdrop on Harry and Hermione...

Vote: Ella

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:22 am

Would the person who confirmed Ella as evil please contact me?

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:22 am

Completely irrelevant but every time I see 3lla's name posted I always think of Rihanna's "Umbrella".

"Ella, ella, ella, eh, eh, eh"

Sorry, I had to get that off my chest.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:28 am

Vote: Ella

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:30 am

I'd be a little more inclined to think that it was Dumbledore.
Anyways, that kind of sucked.

Vote: Ella

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:34 am

Regan wrote:I'd be a little more inclined to think that it was Dumbledore.
Anyways, that kind of sucked.

Vote: Ella


...Why on earth did that "suck"? The only people stopped were the baddies!

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:41 am

It was terribly anti-climactic, and you don't know that only the baddies were stopped. Anyways, I was speaking more about the lack of execution. With every passing day that there is no execution, the gap between innocents and baddies closes.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:48 am

Regan wrote:It was terribly anti-climactic, and you don't know that only the baddies were stopped. Anyways, I was speaking more about the lack of execution. With every passing day that there is no execution, the gap between innocents and baddies closes.


My apologies. I do know, however, that I wasn't stopped, and I know the role doubler wasn't either, because I was doubled. Please, Role Doubler, contact me, we need to talk.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:50 am

Other results went through, Regan.

Ammer, I now hate you for getting that song in my head.

Dumbledore was the one responsible for the lights going out - have just confirmed it with them.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 22, 2008 4:01 am

vote:ella


going with the flow expressing no opinions
Topic locked