Sat Aug 13, 2005 7:47 pm
Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:31 am
Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:45 pm
Sun Aug 14, 2005 2:26 pm
Sun Aug 14, 2005 11:36 pm
Twitchy wrote:regulus was a death eater so it would also have been easier for him to get the horcrux....
Tharkun wrote:You know, the last book got me into astrology (well, no actual sun signs) - this book is getting me into tarot (to a degree) - who says Harry Potter doesn't draw you into the occult?![]()
Mon Aug 15, 2005 1:47 am
Tharkun wrote:http://www.mugglenet.com/editorials/edi ... an01.shtml
That editorial makes the strongest case I've seen that R.A.B. is someone other than Regulus. But you know, I still think it's him, especially as JKR said we'd no doubt identify one of the Horcruxes before the week was out, and we identified the Grimmauld Place Locket.
Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:44 am
Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:38 pm
VeraX wrote:What if R.A.B. is three people, the first initial of each?
Yes, I know that makes no sence because in the note it says I and things in it, but maybe the note writer was refering to himself.
And hey, Dumbledore said one person couldn't do it by themselves, right?![]()
Ah.. I'm so completely clueless it isn't even funny.
Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:06 am
VeraX wrote:And hey, Dumbledore said one person couldn't do it by themselves, right?![]()
Wed Aug 17, 2005 8:40 pm
Divine wrote:Tharkun wrote:http://www.mugglenet.com/editorials/edi ... an01.shtml
That editorial makes the strongest case I've seen that R.A.B. is someone other than Regulus. But you know, I still think it's him, especially as JKR said we'd no doubt identify one of the Horcruxes before the week was out, and we identified the Grimmauld Place Locket.
That article was very interesting... Mr. Borgin, eh? I'd never have suspected him, but it sort of makes sense now that I've read it.
Ack, now I don't know whether to think that it's Regulus Black or Mr. Borgin ='(.
Harry Potter didn't really draw me into any fortune-telling methods, because I was already interested in them before I started reading the series. Tarot cards are cool.
Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:18 am
Josephine wrote:It makes sense as JKR loves introducing "minor" characters and then making them a lot more crucial and deep then we initially think.
Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:55 am
Divine wrote:Josephine wrote:It makes sense as JKR loves introducing "minor" characters and then making them a lot more crucial and deep then we initially think.
That reminds me of a page I read on mugglenet about anagrams. Ollivander is an anagram of "An Evil Lord". Considering how anagrams are so important in the story (with the Tom Marvolo Riddle/I am Lord Voldemort) and everything, I wouldn't be surprised it he's bad.
And remember, he mysteriously disappeared, too. He didn't die. Just disappeared.
Thu Aug 18, 2005 1:35 am
Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:23 am
Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:46 am