For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Thu Aug 25, 2005 12:42 pm

See. TDG = Always Evil :D

Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:19 pm

sirclucky wrote:See. TDG = Always Evil :D


Careful; next time they'll make him an innocent. =P

Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:21 pm

It wouldn't really matter, everyone would vote TDG anyway as they assume the same as usual. Either that or now everyone is conviced TDG can't be evil because he always is.

Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:23 pm

Inexistence wrote:It wouldn't really matter, everyone would vote TDG anyway as they assume the same as usual. Either that or now everyone is conviced TDG can't be evil because he always is.


Or you could just use logic. =P

Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:24 pm

Anubis wrote:
sirclucky wrote:See. TDG = Always Evil :D


Careful; next time they'll make him an innocent. =P


Most likely. :P

And besides... he's not always evil. There was that one time, where he was... a dreamer... and... um... *Voice fades slowly*

Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:31 pm

Dranzer is....innocent. Or, at least neutral. Good job Dranzer, you saved yourself..

Really, really bad news about keith, he would have been really helpful....
and I knew TDG waas a bad'n.

Anubis wrote:
Inexistence wrote:It wouldn't really matter, everyone would vote TDG anyway as they assume the same as usual. Either that or now everyone is conviced TDG can't be evil because he always is.


Or you could just use logic. =P


I fid that proof works well too, wihch we had, thanks to Keith. -mourns-

Yoshi edit: Please leave double (or more) posting to the MC only.

Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:49 pm

Inexistence wrote:It wouldn't really matter, everyone would vote TDG anyway as they assume the same as usual. Either that or now everyone is conviced TDG can't be evil because he always is.


Not necessarily. I'm usually evil and I haven't been chased by the crowd because of it... yet. *burns the mindless bandwagoners* :p At least they had proof on TDG which helped greatly, it's not like people voted for him just because he's always bad, there was proof to go with it (and good enough proof at that).

Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:53 pm

Yeah, I wouldn't have voted for TDG just randomly because is evil a lot, I voted because Keith had proof (and it was right too).

Anyway, I have a few suspects that seem a little suspicous to me, but I'll keep those to myself for now, as I have no real proof.

Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:55 pm

I just realized something (yes, I'm late on these type of things). How is "The Trio" going to kill now, we all know not to open the package. :P

Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:56 pm

Kugetsu wrote:I just realized something (yes, I'm late on these type of things). How is "The Trio" going to kill now, we all know not to open the package. :P


I don't know- I suppose it could just open automatically to kill us.

Otherwise, it would be a pretty crappy way of killing people. XD

Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:59 pm

Yeah, I think it is automatic. Also, it said he could only vote twice, maybe we should keep a lookout for such activity? It's still early, but later it could be conclusive.

Thu Aug 25, 2005 2:23 pm

Pixa wrote:Yeah, I think it is automatic. Also, it said he could only vote twice, maybe we should keep a lookout for such activity? It's still early, but later it could be conclusive.


Agreed.

Neville died. =(

And why is Inexistence posting on this thread? lol XD.

And has Dranzer proven her innocence, now?

Thu Aug 25, 2005 2:25 pm

Divine wrote:
Pixa wrote:Yeah, I think it is automatic. Also, it said he could only vote twice, maybe we should keep a lookout for such activity? It's still early, but later it could be conclusive.


Agreed.

Neville died. =(

And why is Inexistence posting on this thread? lol XD.

And has Dranzer proven her innocence, now?


She has, supposedly, but I for one would like to know how.

Thu Aug 25, 2005 2:31 pm

If anyone would like to tell me how she has proven her innocence, I'd like to know too.

*is still female in game* lol, I'll shut up now.

Thu Aug 25, 2005 2:56 pm

Vote: CWisgood

Undeniable proof on that one, though I'm not sure the person who gave it to me wants it revealed, it could...really endanger him.
Topic locked