Difference between revisions of "User talk:A Neezles A"

From NeoDex
Jump to: navigation, search
m (User:Hagrid835)
(User:Hagrid835: final)
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 
::And to be sure the accounts are sock, mind you. No socks please, but be sure something is a sock at least. ;) --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 23:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 
::And to be sure the accounts are sock, mind you. No socks please, but be sure something is a sock at least. ;) --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 23:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
 
:::My suggestion is that you please leave the good faith edits there, since you said above earlier that good faith edits are always welcome. For example, this user has reverted vandalism by another IP, and by reverting him you've just placed the vandalism back on the page, as shown [http://pinkpt.com/neodex/index.php?title=Neopets%3A_The_Official_Magazine&diff=47866&oldid=47860 here]. [[User:Pinkgirl34|Pink]][[User talk:Pinkgirl34|girl]][[User:Pinkgirl34/NQII Walkthrough|34]] 00:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 
:::My suggestion is that you please leave the good faith edits there, since you said above earlier that good faith edits are always welcome. For example, this user has reverted vandalism by another IP, and by reverting him you've just placed the vandalism back on the page, as shown [http://pinkpt.com/neodex/index.php?title=Neopets%3A_The_Official_Magazine&diff=47866&oldid=47860 here]. [[User:Pinkgirl34|Pink]][[User talk:Pinkgirl34|girl]][[User:Pinkgirl34/NQII Walkthrough|34]] 00:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
They should be blocked/deleted/suspended/etc. to begin with since they are targeting a single editor who they are not. ''That'' is the point. If they are the same person...then we have an issue. The edits can stay ''if they are valid'', but whoever that editor is ''cannot'' and '''will not''' edit from an account that pokes at another editor. '''''Final'''''. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 00:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:30, 29 September 2009

User talk:A Neezles A/Archive1

Messages

Greetings from Jacob

Greetings! Just thought I would stop by and say hello. If you are unaware, I am Jacob, former admin of the NeoDex. It's been awhile since I've been around, and while I don't know what's really happened between now and then, I still have some articles I've been meaning to touch upon. It's good to see you've taken to the NeoDex, and have even made use of the username space provided to users. And I thought only I and a few others would do so. ;) --Jacob 06:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Hiya there Jacob. Yes I have read the NeoDex before and I do know you. I wondered about your long absence somehow.

User:Hagrid835

Hi, just wondering, should we tag his sockpuppets and request for them to be blocked even if they are not used for vandalism but are used for good faith edits? Pinkgirl34 16:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Nope. Destiny Charlotte 16:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Good faith edits should always be welcome.
And to be sure the accounts are sock, mind you. No socks please, but be sure something is a sock at least. ;) --Jacob 23:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
My suggestion is that you please leave the good faith edits there, since you said above earlier that good faith edits are always welcome. For example, this user has reverted vandalism by another IP, and by reverting him you've just placed the vandalism back on the page, as shown here. Pinkgirl34 00:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

They should be blocked/deleted/suspended/etc. to begin with since they are targeting a single editor who they are not. That is the point. If they are the same person...then we have an issue. The edits can stay if they are valid, but whoever that editor is cannot and will not edit from an account that pokes at another editor. Final. --Jacob 00:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)