Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scorchstone"

From NeoDex
Jump to: navigation, search
(List: plans of an update being spoke of)
(Release dates: new section)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
:On an update, I'm considering using the pretty much unused battledome equipment images for the list, and going over it with the current editing/mergers ([[:Image:BE Stat Heal.gif|this is one of those images]] I speak of). --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 09:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 
:On an update, I'm considering using the pretty much unused battledome equipment images for the list, and going over it with the current editing/mergers ([[:Image:BE Stat Heal.gif|this is one of those images]] I speak of). --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 09:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Release dates ==
 +
 +
Finishing up on my update of the article, and the only thing that I can see missing is the release dates of Scorchstones/Dragonstones and the Jade one itself (along with when it retired). I'm sure this can be discovered through someone else, along with a better means to updated the overview section, which I'm content with leaving at this time. Again, release dates are all that I believe is needed. Other than that, article is finished at this time. --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 10:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:14, 2 October 2009

Deletion?

The user Daeron places a deletion template on the article without even stating a reason why? :S Okay. I'm confused. This may be due to his/her intention to create an article for each Scorchstone, which if that was the case, this wouldn't be deleted, but turned into a disambiguation article. However, we don't even know if we will do such a thing yet, or if it's even needed...so i suppose we are on the hold for now. --Jacob 23:56, 3 Jul 2007 (UTC)

The Neodex is not a database of items. Articles can be made denoting types of items and item collections, but not individual items. Hence, this article should be preserved but we should not have individual articles for each scorchstone, no more than for each snowball, or codestone, or an article dedicated to the item 2/3 Green Pepper Omelette. --Macbeth 02:05, 4 Jul 2007 (UTC)
Because of what is aid above, we can merge Jade Scorchstone into this article, and mayhaps have it's own section as well...or should more discussion be had? --Jacob 14:43, 21 Oct 2007 (UTC)

List

I'm not sure if this alpha order for the list is the best way to order it. I was thinking it might be more useful to have them in two lists one of Healing Stones in order of healing ability, and the other a list of Defensive Stones in order of icons of defense. I'm guessing if they are listed they should also be notated with full Battle info instead of the short-cut I took? But the info is there now, so that should help.--Cath 00:00, 11 Aug 2007 (UTC)

Agreed in having 2 seperate lists. i've been meaning to do an update of this article as well, every since another user spurred me on into creating the Template:BattleItem (which i don't think will be used with any of the scorchstones here, as it would be redundant). And the info you've put forth does help. thank you. :) --Jacob 00:18, 11 Aug 2007 (UTC)
On an update, I'm considering using the pretty much unused battledome equipment images for the list, and going over it with the current editing/mergers (this is one of those images I speak of). --Jacob 09:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Release dates

Finishing up on my update of the article, and the only thing that I can see missing is the release dates of Scorchstones/Dragonstones and the Jade one itself (along with when it retired). I'm sure this can be discovered through someone else, along with a better means to updated the overview section, which I'm content with leaving at this time. Again, release dates are all that I believe is needed. Other than that, article is finished at this time. --Jacob 10:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC)