| On discussion pages like this, remember to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
|
| You are not currently logged in. This edit will be associated with your IP address in the page's edit history.
|
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 3: |
Line 3: |
|
| |
|
| :I tried to re-trace the vandal's movements and went to the [http://pinkpt.com/neodex/index.php/Special:Undelete/Talk:Random_Event deletion history]. Seems that Lord Matt created this in November of 2005 and all subsequent edits were the vandal's doing. I don't know if Matt's edit was the only one before the vandal struck or not. --[[User:Dizzy|Dizzy]] 02:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC) | | :I tried to re-trace the vandal's movements and went to the [http://pinkpt.com/neodex/index.php/Special:Undelete/Talk:Random_Event deletion history]. Seems that Lord Matt created this in November of 2005 and all subsequent edits were the vandal's doing. I don't know if Matt's edit was the only one before the vandal struck or not. --[[User:Dizzy|Dizzy]] 02:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC) |
|
| |
| ::To be honest, I don't think this Talk page got much attention to begin with, so for all I know...he ''was'' the last to edit it. :o --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 08:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Karma? ==
| |
|
| |
| Personally, I think this karma thing is a lode of junk... there is no and has never been any reason to believe that it actually exists and I feel that doing anything other than mentioning the general belief in "Neopets Karma"... which I'm not even sure is around much any more... is all that is necessary... I mean, creating simple sample formulas??? It goes a bit far.
| |
|
| |
| And the same with the neopet happiness... this is an encyclopedia and we're essentially spreading rumors based on nothing. ''It's believed keeping Neopets well fed''... by whom? I've never in all my time on Neo heard this rumor. Is there any reason that anyone can think of that these two sections shouldn't be either removed entirely or minimized and put in a new section called "speculation"?
| |
|
| |
| ''However, sometimes TNT reduces the chances of random events on these pages.'' - source?
| |
|
| |
| Sorry if I sound upset, I just really find this sort of speculation completely out of place on something that is supposed to be based on facts unless it's strictly and carefully marked as being speculative... I should think that the fact that TNT has denied the existence of any sort of karma system in the past should be proof enough... -[[User:Cath|Cath]] 12:42, 19 August 2011 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
| :Agreed. I'm removing it now. Good catch. - [[User:Emeraldosprey|Emerald Osprey]] 12:43, 19 August 2011 (CDT)
| |