Difference between revisions of "Talk:Newbie"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(i agree with merger. :¬)) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I concur. makes sense, seeing and newbie is a part of noob. i assume "N00b" will be the main article, right, and "Newbie" a section in it? --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 22:03, 27 Aug 2006 (CDT) | :I concur. makes sense, seeing and newbie is a part of noob. i assume "N00b" will be the main article, right, and "Newbie" a section in it? --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 22:03, 27 Aug 2006 (CDT) | ||
:While I disagree whether the difference between 'n00b' and 'newbie' is moot, however, I agree with the proposed merger: the terms are similar, are occasionally used interchangably, and it would appear 'n00b' was derived from 'newbie'... --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 10:55, 28 Aug 2006 (CDT) | :While I disagree whether the difference between 'n00b' and 'newbie' is moot, however, I agree with the proposed merger: the terms are similar, are occasionally used interchangably, and it would appear 'n00b' was derived from 'newbie'... --[[User:Macbeth|Macbeth]] 10:55, 28 Aug 2006 (CDT) | ||
Spamming Newbs? I've never really heard of this term. Aren't these people normally just called spammers? I move that we delete this section from the article. '''--[[User:NeoEva88|NeoEva88]] 17:22, 11 Sep 2006 (CDT)''' | |||
Revision as of 22:22, 11 September 2006
It is arguable about whether or not there is a difference between newbie and n00b, and even if there is, the two articles can still have their content on one page. Definitely should be merged. --NeoEva88 21:34, 27 Aug 2006 (CDT)
- I concur. makes sense, seeing and newbie is a part of noob. i assume "N00b" will be the main article, right, and "Newbie" a section in it? --Jacob 22:03, 27 Aug 2006 (CDT)
- While I disagree whether the difference between 'n00b' and 'newbie' is moot, however, I agree with the proposed merger: the terms are similar, are occasionally used interchangably, and it would appear 'n00b' was derived from 'newbie'... --Macbeth 10:55, 28 Aug 2006 (CDT)
Spamming Newbs? I've never really heard of this term. Aren't these people normally just called spammers? I move that we delete this section from the article. --NeoEva88 17:22, 11 Sep 2006 (CDT)