User talk:SwordFire/AC Result - Revision history

SwordFire: /* Final version? */

2007-07-05T00:40:33Z

Final version?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:40, 5 July 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	==Final version?==		==Final version?==
	I recently updated a version of your table in the altador Cup article...what do you think? --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 17:57, 4 Jul 2007 (UTC)		I recently updated a version of your table in the altador Cup article...what do you think? --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 17:57, 4 Jul 2007 (UTC)

			:The matches for each day will be all over the place, but the table itself is much smaller and easier to maintain/modify. Also, it is much more easier to understand. I prefer this final version. :) --[[User:SwordFire\|SwordFire]] 00:40, 5 Jul 2007 (UTC)

Jacob: final version?

2007-07-04T17:57:59Z

final version?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:57, 4 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Second Revision==		==Second Revision==
	Ohhh...I really like this one. With the dates on the side, readers can see how each team faced the other on each date. and i really like the small three tabs to signify which competitions were won. A detailed explanation will need to be given to the reader, but it will be worth it of course. :) The table is of course large, but that can't be helped, as the cells are as large as the team icons are, and with 16 of them...shrugs. I like it very much. One thing on the placement of the teams on the table: should they be alphabetized along the top and right? --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 01:09, 1 Jul 2007 (UTC)		Ohhh...I really like this one. With the dates on the side, readers can see how each team faced the other on each date. and i really like the small three tabs to signify which competitions were won. A detailed explanation will need to be given to the reader, but it will be worth it of course. :) The table is of course large, but that can't be helped, as the cells are as large as the team icons are, and with 16 of them...shrugs. I like it very much. One thing on the placement of the teams on the table: should they be alphabetized along the top and right? --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 01:09, 1 Jul 2007 (UTC)

	:Unfortunately it is not possible without breaking the line-up. If we remove the result by date, we'll be able to sort the team according to alphabetical order, and also reduce the table significantly into a proper square table. --[[User:SwordFire\|SwordFire]] 01:35, 1 Jul 2007 (UTC)		:Unfortunately it is not possible without breaking the line-up. If we remove the result by date, we'll be able to sort the team according to alphabetical order, and also reduce the table significantly into a proper square table. --[[User:SwordFire\|SwordFire]] 01:35, 1 Jul 2007 (UTC)

			==Final version?==
			I recently updated a version of your table in the altador Cup article...what do you think? --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 17:57, 4 Jul 2007 (UTC)

SwordFire: /* Second Revision */ Not possible...

2007-07-01T01:35:49Z

Second Revision: Not possible...

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 1 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Second Revision==		==Second Revision==
	Ohhh...I really like this one. With the dates on the side, readers can see how each team faced the other on each date. and i really like the small three tabs to signify which competitions were won. A detailed explanation will need to be given to the reader, but it will be worth it of course. :) The table is of course large, but that can't be helped, as the cells are as large as the team icons are, and with 16 of them...shrugs. I like it very much. One thing on the placement of the teams on the table: should they be alphabetized along the top and right? --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 01:09, 1 Jul 2007 (UTC)		Ohhh...I really like this one. With the dates on the side, readers can see how each team faced the other on each date. and i really like the small three tabs to signify which competitions were won. A detailed explanation will need to be given to the reader, but it will be worth it of course. :) The table is of course large, but that can't be helped, as the cells are as large as the team icons are, and with 16 of them...shrugs. I like it very much. One thing on the placement of the teams on the table: should they be alphabetized along the top and right? --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 01:09, 1 Jul 2007 (UTC)
			:Unfortunately it is not possible without breaking the line-up. If we remove the result by date, we'll be able to sort the team according to alphabetical order, and also reduce the table significantly into a proper square table. --[[User:SwordFire\|SwordFire]] 01:35, 1 Jul 2007 (UTC)

Jacob: on the second revision

2007-07-01T01:09:51Z

on the second revision

New page

==Second Revision==
Ohhh...I really like this one. With the dates on the side, readers can see how each team faced the other on each date. and i really like the small three tabs to signify which competitions were won. A detailed explanation will need to be given to the reader, but it will be worth it of course. :) The table is of course large, but that can't be helped, as the cells are as large as the team icons are, and with 16 of them...*shrugs*. I like it very much. One thing on the placement of the teams on the table: should they be alphabetized along the top and right? --[[User:Jacob|Jacob]] 01:09, 1 Jul 2007 (UTC)