Talk:Random Event - Revision history

Dizzy: Reverted edits by 193.105.210.84 (talk) to last revision by Emeraldosprey

2012-03-12T17:11:29Z

Reverted edits by 193.105.210.84 (talk) to last revision by Emeraldosprey

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 12 March 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:Agreed. I'm removing it now. Good catch. - [[User:Emeraldosprey\|Emerald Osprey]] 12:43, 19 August 2011 (CDT)		:Agreed. I'm removing it now. Good catch. - [[User:Emeraldosprey\|Emerald Osprey]] 12:43, 19 August 2011 (CDT)

	~~== ?????: xrumer ????????? - ???????????????? ???? ??? ???. ==~~

	?? ??????????: ??????? ??????, xrumer cracked, xrumer ??????, allsubmitter ??? xrumer, xrumer 5 demo. ????????? XRumer (xrumer ?????????) - ????????????? ??? ???????? ???????? ? ??????, ???????? ?????, ?????, ?????, ???????? ? ?. ?.

193.105.210.84: /* Новый: xrumer установка - профессиональный софт для СЕО. */ new section

2012-03-12T14:14:30Z

Новый: xrumer установка - профессиональный софт для СЕО.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:14, 12 March 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:Agreed. I'm removing it now. Good catch. - [[User:Emeraldosprey\|Emerald Osprey]] 12:43, 19 August 2011 (CDT)		:Agreed. I'm removing it now. Good catch. - [[User:Emeraldosprey\|Emerald Osprey]] 12:43, 19 August 2011 (CDT)

			== ?????: xrumer ????????? - ???????????????? ???? ??? ???. ==

			?? ??????????: ??????? ??????, xrumer cracked, xrumer ??????, allsubmitter ??? xrumer, xrumer 5 demo. ????????? XRumer (xrumer ?????????) - ????????????? ??? ???????? ???????? ? ??????, ???????? ?????, ?????, ?????, ???????? ? ?. ?.

Emeraldosprey: Reverted edits by 193.105.210.84 (talk) to last revision by Emeraldosprey

2012-01-12T23:31:48Z

Reverted edits by 193.105.210.84 (talk) to last revision by Emeraldosprey

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:31, 12 January 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:Agreed. I'm removing it now. Good catch. - [[User:Emeraldosprey\|Emerald Osprey]] 12:43, 19 August 2011 (CDT)		:Agreed. I'm removing it now. Good catch. - [[User:Emeraldosprey\|Emerald Osprey]] 12:43, 19 August 2011 (CDT)

	~~== ??????? ????? ???? ???????? ??????? Liska (?????) ==~~

	??????? ?????: ??????? ????? ????????? ?????? Liska (?????), ????? ??????? ???? Liska (?????), ??????? ????? ?? ?????????? Liska (?????), ????????? ???????????? ????? ??????? Liska (?????), ??????? ????? ?? ??????? ????????? Liska (?????).

193.105.210.84: /* женская обувь зима интернет магазин Liska (Лиска) */ new section

2012-01-12T22:47:53Z

женская обувь зима интернет магазин Liska (Лиска): new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, 12 January 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:Agreed. I'm removing it now. Good catch. - [[User:Emeraldosprey\|Emerald Osprey]] 12:43, 19 August 2011 (CDT)		:Agreed. I'm removing it now. Good catch. - [[User:Emeraldosprey\|Emerald Osprey]] 12:43, 19 August 2011 (CDT)

			== ??????? ????? ???? ???????? ??????? Liska (?????) ==

			??????? ?????: ??????? ????? ????????? ?????? Liska (?????), ????? ??????? ???? Liska (?????), ??????? ????? ?? ?????????? Liska (?????), ????????? ???????????? ????? ??????? Liska (?????), ??????? ????? ?? ??????? ????????? Liska (?????).

Emeraldosprey: /* Karma? */ Eyup.

2011-08-19T17:43:51Z

Karma?: Eyup.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 19 August 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Sorry if I sound upset, I just really find this sort of speculation completely out of place on something that is supposed to be based on facts unless it's strictly and carefully marked as being speculative... I should think that the fact that TNT has denied the existence of any sort of karma system in the past should be proof enough... -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 12:42, 19 August 2011 (CDT)		Sorry if I sound upset, I just really find this sort of speculation completely out of place on something that is supposed to be based on facts unless it's strictly and carefully marked as being speculative... I should think that the fact that TNT has denied the existence of any sort of karma system in the past should be proof enough... -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 12:42, 19 August 2011 (CDT)

			:Agreed. I'm removing it now. Good catch. - [[User:Emeraldosprey\|Emerald Osprey]] 12:43, 19 August 2011 (CDT)

Cath: /* Karma? */ final paragraph and signature.

2011-08-19T17:42:28Z

Karma?: final paragraph and signature.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 19 August 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:

	''However, sometimes TNT reduces the chances of random events on these pages.'' - source?		''However, sometimes TNT reduces the chances of random events on these pages.'' - source?

			Sorry if I sound upset, I just really find this sort of speculation completely out of place on something that is supposed to be based on facts unless it's strictly and carefully marked as being speculative... I should think that the fact that TNT has denied the existence of any sort of karma system in the past should be proof enough... -[[User:Cath\|Cath]] 12:42, 19 August 2011 (CDT)

Cath: /* Karma? */ new section

2011-08-19T17:40:39Z

Karma?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:40, 19 August 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:

	::To be honest, I don't think this Talk page got much attention to begin with, so for all I know...he ''was'' the last to edit it. :o --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 08:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC)		::To be honest, I don't think this Talk page got much attention to begin with, so for all I know...he ''was'' the last to edit it. :o --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 08:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

			== Karma? ==

			Personally, I think this karma thing is a lode of junk... there is no and has never been any reason to believe that it actually exists and I feel that doing anything other than mentioning the general belief in "Neopets Karma"... which I'm not even sure is around much any more... is all that is necessary... I mean, creating simple sample formulas??? It goes a bit far.

			And the same with the neopet happiness... this is an encyclopedia and we're essentially spreading rumors based on nothing. ''It's believed keeping Neopets well fed''... by whom? I've never in all my time on Neo heard this rumor. Is there any reason that anyone can think of that these two sections shouldn't be either removed entirely or minimized and put in a new section called "speculation"?

			''However, sometimes TNT reduces the chances of random events on these pages.'' - source?

Jacob: /* Cleared talk page? */ probably

2009-09-24T08:57:08Z

Cleared talk page?: probably

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 24 September 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:I tried to re-trace the vandal's movements and went to the [http://pinkpt.com/neodex/index.php/Special:Undelete/Talk:Random_Event deletion history]. Seems that Lord Matt created this in November of 2005 and all subsequent edits were the vandal's doing. I don't know if Matt's edit was the only one before the vandal struck or not. --[[User:Dizzy\|Dizzy]] 02:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)		:I tried to re-trace the vandal's movements and went to the [http://pinkpt.com/neodex/index.php/Special:Undelete/Talk:Random_Event deletion history]. Seems that Lord Matt created this in November of 2005 and all subsequent edits were the vandal's doing. I don't know if Matt's edit was the only one before the vandal struck or not. --[[User:Dizzy\|Dizzy]] 02:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

			::To be honest, I don't think this Talk page got much attention to begin with, so for all I know...he ''was'' the last to edit it. :o --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 08:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Dizzy: I found ... something =S

2009-09-24T02:28:09Z

I found ... something =S

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:28, 24 September 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Cleared talk page?==		==Cleared talk page?==
	Don't mind me. Just cleaning the double redirects out. Seems like this talk page was cleared too. Any way to get it back? --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 10:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC)		Don't mind me. Just cleaning the double redirects out. Seems like this talk page was cleared too. Any way to get it back? --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 10:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

			:I tried to re-trace the vandal's movements and went to the [http://pinkpt.com/neodex/index.php/Special:Undelete/Talk:Random_Event deletion history]. Seems that Lord Matt created this in November of 2005 and all subsequent edits were the vandal's doing. I don't know if Matt's edit was the only one before the vandal struck or not. --[[User:Dizzy\|Dizzy]] 02:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Jacob: cleared double redirect, and question

2009-09-23T10:35:15Z

cleared double redirect, and question

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:35, 23 September 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~#REDIRECT~~ [[~~Talk~~:~~Random Event~~]]		==Cleared talk page?==
			Don't mind me. Just cleaning the double redirects out. Seems like this talk page was cleared too. Any way to get it back? --[[User:Jacob\|Jacob]] 10:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC)