For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:52 am

Move: Mordor

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:24 pm

Ammer wrote:I just have a question for malibu, how can there be neutrals in LOTR? I thought you were either good or bad?


2 words: Tom Bombadil

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 4:09 pm

Find and take the one ring TO RULE THEM ALL! That's all I know about LOTR. :P A mocking film.

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:52 pm

Vote: Ammer
Vote: Malibu
Move to: Lothlórien
because I don't think I've been there yet...

Word on the street is that Ammer is evil. So let's execute a non-innocent tonight! And Malibu, I have yet to see any evidence that you're telling the truth. How long has it been since you said you're using your role-reveal? If you need suggestions on whom to use it, may I suggest Jas? (Just picked someone out of thin air that I know nothing about.)

(Ckillor, it wasn't the "innocents" who killed you off, by the way -- it was one person who apparently missed that you'd been confirmed as innocent. Not that that changes the outcome...)

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:57 pm

Vote: Ammer
Vote: Malibu
Stay: rivendell
(I don't plan on moving XD)

malibu, you've only confused me more with that explanation....

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:15 pm

Vote: Malibu
Vote: Ammer
Move to: Lorien


Targeting Tom, being dreamt of as evil, not to mention surviving a night attack and an execution... It's a bit too many coincidences for me.

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:18 pm

I guess word on being evil is good enough for right now. Sorry Ammer.

Vote: Ammer
Vote: malibu
Move: Helm's Depp

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:47 pm

Move: Bree

Seems like a good place to stay for the moment.
Also, I'm quite unwilling to go with a 'word that someone is evil' for the moment. Though I agree that it's high time malibu showed some concrete evidence of her innocence. Role-reveal Jas is good enough for me. Or maybe Ammer or Siniri? Sorry, Siniri, but in my opinion (not experience, as I have none), the first person to point a finger is only making him-or herself suspicious.

For now, I will...

Vote: No execution

This is definitely likely to change, though.

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:02 pm

Vote: malibu
Vote: Ammer
Stay in: Isengarde


C'mon, baby, double execution. :D

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:27 pm

Vote: Ammer
Vote: Malibu

Location: Minas Tirith

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 8:09 pm

Vote: Ammer
Vote: Malibu

Stay in: Bree

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 8:33 pm

What kind of evil are they both supposed to be?
I asked this question about malibu yesterday and never got an answer.

I wouldn't think it would be that hard to answer the question.

Move: Mordor

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 8:39 pm

Woo, my first appointment this afternoon went SUPER fast (yeah for a new doc!) and I've got about 20 mins before I need to leave for my next one. So. You guys get a voting and locations update! :D (Yes, the happy meds my dad prescribed me last night are totally kicking the strep throat in the butt, so I am feeling MUCH better now! :D )

Voting Update:
Ammer (7): Siniri, loser, Wind, Regan, DM, Nikita, Byakuya San
Malibu (7): Siniri, loser, Wind, Regan, DM, Nikita, Byakuya San
No exec (1): Pardona

Players still in Middle-Earth: 25 Majority Single: 13 Majority Double: 19

I can really get used to this everyone decides on the same person or persons to vote for. :P

Locations:
the Shire:
Bree: Pardona, Byakuya San
Rivendell: loser
Moria:
Lothlórien: Siniri, Wind
Isengard: DM
Fangorn Forest:
Minas Tirith: Nikita
Helm's Deep: Regan
Mordor: machinedreams, Miyu

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:18 pm

Pardona wrote:the first person to point a finger is only making him-or herself suspicious.


Personally, I don't think werewolf should be played like that. People come out with information to try and help the innocents win the game; of course the information should be analysed and scrutinised, but the messenger shouldn't instantly become the suspect. A role reveal could be used in far better places.

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:29 pm

Pixa wrote:
Pardona wrote:the first person to point a finger is only making him-or herself suspicious.


Personally, I don't think werewolf should be played like that. People come out with information to try and help the innocents win the game; of course the information should be analysed and scrutinised, but the messenger shouldn't instantly become the suspect. A role reveal could be used in far better places.

Additionally, if my info were wrong, I'd basically be outing myself as a baddie and quickly be killed off, which would hurt my chances of winning -- but I'm not stupid, so I didn't do that -- I'm innocent. 0:) People complain about people just jumping on bandwagons, but bandwagons are really the primary way that executions happen in WW -- as long as the bandwagon is rational.

To that end, sorry for not clarifying early:
Ammer was dreamed evil (sorry, I wasn't given a role, nor did I ask for one).
Malibu was dreamed evil, and she was tracked as having targeted Pixa on the same night he was attacked. Again, I didn't ask the dreamer or tracker for the role. Malibu claims to be able to find neutrals and convert them to innocents, but she hasn't been able to provide any proof. She offered to do a role reveal as proof yesterday, but it still hasn't happened.

That's the evidence I have. Take it as you like, and vote as you like.
Topic locked