For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:12 am

I am not going to reveal my role to you Ruby. I honestly don't think that I need to reveal my role to anyone else. And enough with the attacks on me. I CAN'T FREAKIN' DO ANYTHING :x

Vote: fzun

There were no dementor attacks and fzun couldn't use her role.

Also, the role double still hasn't come forward (at least to my knowledge) about who they doubled the night of the double poisonings. Hello? We need to know who you doubled!

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:35 am

May wrote:I am not going to reveal my role to you Ruby. I honestly don't think that I need to reveal my role to anyone else. And enough with the attacks on me. I CAN'T FREAKIN' DO ANYTHING :x

Vote: fzun

There were no dementor attacks and fzun couldn't use her role.

Also, the role double still hasn't come forward (at least to my knowledge) about who they doubled the night of the double poisonings. Hello? We need to know who you doubled!


Seconded, the role doubler part anyway.

Vote: Fzun

I'm going to be so mad if she's a member of the I-Squad - I was dreaming her the night I died. -_-

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:57 am

Vote: fzun

I'm willing to go out on a limb and vote for her.

This vote is very temporary, so if something comes up, I'll change it.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:03 am

Ammer wrote:Vote: fzun

I'm willing to go out on a limb and vote for her.

This vote is very temporary, so if something comes up, I'll change it.

Aye, same here.

Vote: fzun

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:13 am

Vote: fzun
I have reason to suspect her, though this is still a tentative vote.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:38 am

Heh. It's weird how people keep being suspicious of the same people as me... I had dozed off just after reading the Night results, and woke up thinking I should vote for fzun before going to bed for real. Well, then:
Vote: fzun
for now

(though my brain is horribly confused on what I know and don't know -- way too many to keep track of)

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:05 am

UNVote: Hansy
UNVote: May

Vote: no execution


Also since apparently my opinion and passing along information puts me on a 'high horse' I will no longer speak out on the board. Sorry for coming off as well whatever.


well atleast the game was fun... whoo go my first and probably only ww game.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 6:08 am

Vote: fzun

For now, I'm joining the bandwagon.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 7:16 am

Woah people are being really sketchy over a game! If you're easily offended or get upset at people lying or attacking you over a little thing (suspicious minds and all that, rar rar rar), WW probably isn't the game for you.

Vote: fzun

It does seem really suspicious that the one night a Dementor attack didn't happen, fzun couldn't use her role.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 8:52 am

Twinkle wrote:Woah people are being really sketchy over a game! If you're easily offended or get upset at people lying or attacking you over a little thing (suspicious minds and all that, rar rar rar), WW probably isn't the game for you.

As Twinkle said, this is a GAME. If are really going to get all hot flushed about it then really dont make it personal. I've just had to shift through 5 pages of posts on this thread all of which I couldn't really make any sense of simply because it wasn't about the game it was about everyone bickering.

Vote: Fzun
I'll change my vote if something convincing comes up, but for now I'm eyeing the fact that the dementors didn't attack last night and fzun was unable to use their role.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:16 am

Although it may have been just a coincidence, the dementors didn't attack like everyone has said, and Fzun didn't use her role.
Vote: Fzun

SORRY FIRST WW BUDDY :'(

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:30 am

Typhoon wrote:Chris, I destroyed a Horcrux Day 3. Was there a "boom" then?


Yes. However:

That theory is probably half baked anyway going by the boomless avada on night 9. It is still curious that the killing curse has missed on every other day there isn't a boom though. Sheer peculiarity of coincidence I suppose.

Everyone leaves me to mindlessly theorise without informing me that the booms are some sort of day attack. In other words, you're all jerks! I realised it was a day attack myself about 10 seconds after I posted, confirmed by the fact that a bazillion people were sitting there not posting for a couple of hours -_-

Also, horray for ressurection, BUT THERE ARE SO MANY. I'm almost certain that at least one isn't legitimate. Considering that (I think) every time someone has said they confirmed their innocent, this would mean one of them is in fact evil as well.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 12:38 pm

So, the *boom*'s are day attacks? o.O How does that work?

Ruby, once again, don't take it personally. Yeah, it's just a game, and I've liked to see you play so far. ;) You were the first voucher for the dreamers, and I think the rezzers did well on rezzing you (of course, unless one of the supposed rezzers is in fact a evil wizard and there is a whole team ready to win this game, merged into the "known innocents". Reminds me of our last time, don't ya Alex? :P). But then again, we also have Tanner, Blake, Alex, thetrueoogabooga and DM was on fire! outed, which in one way is great because we have so many different "safe" opinions to read. I really didn't mind you voting for me, but there are too many people exposed already, so I just would've told you that Alex could vouch for me, as she did already :)

Now on Miyu's death. Obviously it's a good thing because she was evil, but I think that, regardless of what her alignment was, we should listen to what she says - she is one of the most logical players I've seen, and I really appreciate it. Getting all the information we can, and making it all crystal before we jump into it, because it's not as linear as a dream result (those can be wrong, of course, but they are "slapped in your face"). Look at what happened to Dyl, for example: There was already a bandwagon on him, based on a misinterpretion of someone, in the end there was nothing leading to him. So I'm taking the day off to read the whole thread again :P Btw Blake, she always plays like that, too. xD

My votes will be, for now:
Vote: fzun - why not? (bandwagoning for the sake of bandwagoning, lol)
Vote: Byakuya-San - You can always add something. Let's try it. :P

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 12:55 pm

Um, hello. Good morning to you all too.

You executed a baddie last night. Ever stop to think that THEY'RE the one behind the attacks, not me?

Besides the fact that I was ATTACKED by dementors two nights ago, why on earth would my own team attack me?

Nice logic and bandwagoning, guys. I'm innocent and Alex can vouch for me on this one. I have work today so I won't be on the thread much to defend myself but look twice at the facts and you'll see I'm not evil.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:47 pm

fzun wrote:You executed a baddie last night. Ever stop to think that THEY'RE the one behind the attacks, not me?

Besides the fact that I was ATTACKED by dementors two nights ago, why on earth would my own team attack me?


Well, firstly, the baddie that was executed last night was a Death Eater, not a Dementor, so I'm pretty certain we can say that she wasn't behind the attacks that didn't show up last night.

Secondly, just because you were attacked doesn't mean you're not on that team. Ginny-ROX was attacked by the Death Eaters, and she was a Death Eater herself.

I know that Tom was in contact with someone with a flip-flopper/bus driver type role. If indeed such a person exists, could you please contact me?
Topic locked