For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:45 am

Princess Miyu wrote:This isn't a dot-to-dot coloring page.

Yes, in that first post you said you were a dreamer. HOWEVER, you did not say that you dreamt of Twinkle as evil. All you said was that Twinkle was responsible for the Dementor attacks - you did not say how you came by that information (in that post).
If you had just said everything in that first post, instead of spreading it out over a few, maybe I wouldn't of questioned it. In case you haven't noticed, I've said it before - I don't blindly follow scraps of information. I don't see why I should start now.

This is werewolf, hastily jumping to conclusions is folly.

Whatever you feel, Miyu...
Dot-to-Dot coloring page? o_O

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:54 am

Something which you do - a partial image sometimes or a whole one. Is created by following the numbers 1 - x, connect them and you get the image.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:55 am

Princess Miyu wrote:Something which you do - a partial image sometimes or a whole one. Is created by following the numbers 1 - x, connect them and you get the image.


She means "connect-the-dots".

Edit: If the roledoubler could contact me with the names of the people they targeted Night 7 and Night 8, that would be amazing.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:09 am

Princess Miyu wrote:Something which you do - a partial image sometimes or a whole one. Is created by following the numbers 1 - x, connect them and you get the image.

Oh. I don't usually call it a "dot-to-dot coloring page" though.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:12 am

Regardless of what people may call it, it does not negate my point.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 9:29 am

Vote: Twinkle
Vote: Dyl


Twinkle cause I believe evilness
Dyl cause he still hasn't replied to my pm....

Are we still allowed to vote twice?

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 10:13 am

Please guys, don't vote for me. I'm contacting someone who's a KNOWN innocent now as I have proof of my innocence, I didn't before. Seriously, it'll be a wasted execution.

Blake, I am NOT behind the dementor attacks. I have had some problems in my personal life which means I haven't been active for two days straight. Note the attacks still happened?

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:24 am

Typhoon wrote:Extenuating circumstances, Blake. Is anyone listening to Warxelo?

Siniri wrote:With all the "known" innocents we now have, it seems like all the unknowns must be baddies, so why don't you guys just start voting them off?


Just because someone's unwilling to share their role, it doesn't necessarily follow that they "must" be evil.

I know that. It was sarcasm because of my frustration. Still, if some people "know" so many people are innocent, and there are still a ton of baddies out there, the odds are higher that if you're not a "known" innocent, you're a baddie. At this point, we really need to be executing people before the innocents are outnumbered. Today, I'll be voting bandwagon -- assuming we can even get one started.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:19 pm

Going to say again, defintiely not evil. I received the potion off mystery person which wiped my memory. Must've been warlexo. :) There's no point in voting for a confirmed innocent just to get an execution, defeats the object of an execution.

Most people in this game are "known innocents" but then again, people lie. Which people are confirmed innocents who we know haven't been converted? Are there any? Maybe some people need to rethink their strategies.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 12:30 pm

Vote: Fzun Because I tend to forget you're playing, even though you've been active.


Between the Altador Cup and my new job I don't post much :P. Plus I'm way too tired/confused to participate in the debate on Twinkle's innocence or lackthereof lol.

In my gut I feel Twinkle is innocent, because I don't think Warxelo can lie about a SP like Rissa said yesterday, but I will vote for her later tonight when I get home if it's needed to get a majority.

edit: Thanks Anvil for saving me last night <3

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 1:19 pm

I don't know if this had been said yet, as I've only briefly skimmed the thread, but Tanner's rez is covered. I've been in contact with them ever since they rezzed DM, so Tanner's good :)

*goes back to re-read thread*

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 2:11 pm

Vote: Twinkle

I trust my homeboy.
Also...

Ange was mauled by a werewolf. She was Lupin, the protector from dementors.

That's terribly ironic.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:18 pm

Gotta say if Twinkle wasnt before she is now innocent....


*finds a nice comfy chair and sits waiting*

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:25 pm

Vote: Byakuya San
Vote: Jas


Haven't seen either around, unless Bya changed their name.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:30 pm

Byakuya San posted 3 pages ago.. the argument and huge quotes pushed pages fast. But they've been around.
Topic locked