For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:29 pm

Sorry it's taken me so long, but with the name changes and everything, it was a bit confusing to sort through. Here's a list of who didn't vote on Days 2 and 3 -- this doesn't necessarily mean they didn't submit lists, but it's possible. It's also possible that the poisoner can only act on certain nights, shares the role, or submitted a list of "no poisoning." For the sake of completeness, I included killed players, since it's *possible* that they might have been the poisoner -- but the role could have been heired. Here are the lists (I apologize for any mistakes -- I checked it twice, but it was a bit confusing for me, so someone please double-check):
Didn't vote either day
8. Lee (f) -> Replaced by Twiz (f)
14. Christopher (m) - poisoned Night 1 (cannot be rezzed)
15. Ammer (m)
33. Rox (m)->replaced by Christopher
34. Missy! (f) - Kissed by Dementors Night 1 - Percy Weasley
35. Moongewl (but just joined the game on night 3 with a new role)
36. Jas (but just joined the game on night 3 with a new role)

Didn't vote day 2
21. Rachel (f) {known not to have submitted a list on day 2; alleged not to have submitted one on day 3}
22. Pixa (m) - Avada'd Night 3 - Fred Weasley
1. Jas (f) -> replaced by Anvil (m)

Didn't vote day 3
29. ginny-ROX (f) - Avada'd Night 2 - Bellatrix
30. warxelo (m)
32. Dyl (m)

My personal thoughts on the list: the original Rox/Jas roles (now Christopher 2/Anvil) couldn't have been the poisoners from night 1, but they could have been heirs. However, I doubt the poisoner was already killed because I don't think Percy, Fred, or Bellatrix was it. The only unknown dead was Christopher 1, but he was poisoned -- so unless there's some special power that can cause the poisoner's attack to rebound (and even if there were, what are the odds that person picked Christopher out of the original 34 to target?), I'm assuming the initial poisoner is still alive.

Given these assumptions, I'd say the top suspects include Lee/Twiz, Ammer, and Rachel, followed by Dyl and warxelo.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:58 pm

Vote: Crazy

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:08 pm

Vote: Crazy

I'm just beating a dead horse with this vote, but meh. I haven't been on to see the developments.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:19 pm

Vote: Crazy

Nothing much more to add really.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:22 pm

That's a bit more helpful, Siniri. I dunno, though. What if the poisoning was just someone's special power? Like a one-time deal or whatever. Although I dunno who would use their special power right away on the first night.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:28 pm

Vote: Crazy

We might as well go with the dreamer, but the chances of Bruces staying alive after he spilled the beans on Crazy is probably slim.

If there is a protector out there, protect Bruces for the time being!

Edit:

I agree with Rissa.

If I was the poisoner, and I had a one time poison, why would I use it on the first night? That's a stupid move.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:32 pm

Rissa wrote:That's a bit more helpful, Siniri. I dunno, though. What if the poisoning was just someone's special power? Like a one-time deal or whatever. Although I dunno who would use their special power right away on the first night.

Then I just wasted a lot of time. A lot of people seem to think it was a OMT, with a possible heir, though -- this is my first game, so I'm just going with their suspicions. I just thought it might be useful to see the info -- interpreting it (using powers if you got 'em, your instincts if you don't) is up to you.

After compiling the list, I don't feel comfortable singling any one of those out for a second execution tonight, but maybe we'll have more info tomorrow.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:39 pm

Rissa wrote:That's a bit more helpful, Siniri. I dunno, though. What if the poisoning was just someone's special power? Like a one-time deal or whatever. Although I dunno who would use their special power right away on the first night.


I think I would agree...I mean, the poisoning only happened once. It could be anything. Maybe someone found something in a room or had the ability to do it once? We'll see, though...

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:40 pm

If there is a poisoner dreamer, at least that'll help them to choose their targets...

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:45 pm

Voting Update

Crazy (23): Bruces galore, Helena, DM was on fire!, Ange, Alex, Twizzler0171, Twinkle, thetrueoogabooga, Typhoon, Rubywinged, Moongewl, Byakuya San, Rissa, 3lla, Pink, Siniri, warxelo, Susannahmio, Hansy, Dyl, Regan, Laryxler, Ammer
Christopher (2): Typhoon, fzun


Players still at Hogwarts: 33 Majority Single: 17 Majority Double: 25

Reminder: Get those lists and locations in! (Yes, we know some of you like to wait until the very last minute)

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sat Jun 14, 2008 11:46 pm

Why would there be a poinsoner dreamer? Unless the role comes with a dreaming or poisoning option and they can just choose which one they can use... I'm relatively new to big games so I don't know if there's a role like that.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 15, 2008 12:31 am

Vote: Crazy
Why not bandwagon?

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:37 am

Vote: Crazy for obvious reasons.
Vote: Blake because I feel like voting twice today, and you were the last poster before me. :P

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 15, 2008 1:51 am

Vote: Crazy

Not sure who else to vote.

Nothing to add, really.

Re: WW 32: Harry Potter

Sun Jun 15, 2008 2:32 am

Siniri, that's useful. Hopefully we'll have more information about tonight, particularly when we add that with who doesn't vote today.

And yeah, protection would be good for bruces. Protector, whoever you are, I'm looking at you XD
Topic locked