Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:56 am
Still doesn't mean that it won't take me awhile to figure this new stuff out. And then if I do, still doesn't mean that I won't worry that Neopets will disapprove of the things I did and freeze me for it.
Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:09 am
Morningstar wrote:dragon's fire wrote:But, I am wondering why every jubjub now seems to be hopping on one leg. Like they are drunken sailors doing a jig.
Morningstar I think thats so they can hold something in their foot when and if TNT releases the wearable acessories.since they can't make the angry at my redraw fist that half the other pets now have.
Lol, so they can hold a glass of beer in that foot? Just like a drunken sailor would? And gosh, I was sure my maraquan jubjub wasn't into alcohol. Seemed so sweet and innocent. Time to take that sparking cider and hide it, huh?
Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:10 am
Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:20 am
Wow. I find it extremely angry how Neopets has sort of transfered everything we used to know and love about Neopets into stuff for litte kids.
Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:26 am
Sun Apr 29, 2007 3:34 am
Refusing to comply with the wishes of a staff member will generally result in a permanent ban. There is simply no excuse for this behaviour.
"Flaming", is when somebody attacks somebody else over the internet, normally in the form of insults. This will not be tolerated. You do not have to agree with every other member of PPT ( And you wont at some point. Believe me). You do not have to like every other member at PPT. You do, however, have to respect every other member of PPT. And when I say respect, I mean respect their right to have their say just as you have the right to yours.
...
If somebody flames you, do NOT retaliate. You will end up in as much trouble as them. Just contact a Moderator.
Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:09 am
Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:13 am
everconfused wrote:Inrun... You Rockand thanks to you for your patience with us.
Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:21 am
Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:50 am
EC wrote:My theory is more along the lines of the people who've been around for a few years and who are older are more likely to be critical, to call TNT on some of the stuff that's gone on (like 4/4/04, sdb, TP, bank glitches, CGers, etc.) and send in the reports. We are the pink poogle toy description:P We whine, whinge, complain and generally can be a royal pain -- but we get our point across even if nothing's done about a situation. I'm guessing they (new management) is going with the thought that newer people won't know directly about alot of the things we've dealt with, won't think (or care?) to send in reports, try to demand attention to problems ... if something comes up that they really don't like they'll just leave.
Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:56 am
everconfused wrote:First, Inrun and TDG ... You Rockand thanks to you for your patience with us.
Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:59 am
mercurius wrote:hmm, the site to me looks like http://www.msn.com now. . . Very professional, clean cut, all the information you'd ever want. I'm 25 years old, been playing about hmm, 7 years. . . I really don't mind the layout change at all - it's the pet redraws that bother me. It actually feels like the site is growing with me. I do actually believe the layout/links are more intuitive. If only they would get rid of the cardboard cutout raised fists!!
Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:09 am
ahoteinrun wrote:I want a cookie... or cinnamin toast crunch. *sulks* I don't think it's patience so much as utter exhaustion.
Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:11 am
anjuna wrote:ahoteinrun wrote:I want a cookie... or cinnamin toast crunch. *sulks* I don't think it's patience so much as utter exhaustion.
Wonderful sentiment to read; this reminds me of an expression: "there is no such thing as patiently waiting .. either you are patient .. or waiting".
Sun Apr 29, 2007 5:12 am
everconfused wrote:P.S. Just looked at that Alexa graph out of curiosity? It looks to me that there's been even less activity on the site than last night. So where are all those people the Editorial says like all the changes?