Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:07 pm
Awww, I didn't mean to betray all your trust... 
The screenshot's real and unedited, and that's the text you'll get. But no, I haven't found any constellations, and I'm pretty sure you can't yet. As for how I got the screenshot... I'll just let you all marvel at my amazingness
The screenshot's real and unedited, and that's the text you'll get. But no, I haven't found any constellations, and I'm pretty sure you can't yet. As for how I got the screenshot... I'll just let you all marvel at my amazingness
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:11 pm
Are we to assume a staff member gave you this screenshot? Or did you do some coding or some such thing to find it? either way, glad to know its not fake, even if you did give us all an embolism....
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:11 pm
dolphinling wrote:Awww, I didn't mean to betray all your trust...
The screenshot's real and unedited, and that's the text you'll get. But no, I haven't found any constellations, and I'm pretty sure you can't yet. As for how I got the screenshot... I'll just let you all marvel at my amazingness
In light of this, I'd have to agree - thankyou for bringing something different to the thread, at least for this short period. I didn't mean to sound so harsh, I guess I was a bit tense and felt there was something up with it. Keep up the good work.
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:12 pm
dolphinling wrote:Awww, I didn't mean to betray all your trust...
The screenshot's real and unedited, and that's the text you'll get. But no, I haven't found any constellations, and I'm pretty sure you can't yet. As for how I got the screenshot... I'll just let you all marvel at my amazingness
You identified a new constellation, yet you haven't found any constellations? So what you're saying is that you found a new constellation but nothing we've been searching for? You're so vague! I hate being so untrusting on certain things, but it's just my nature. And my nature gets very frusterated by vagueness because I'm the sort of person that likes having questions answered and knowing the absolute truth.
Edit: After sifting through your neopets folder and looking at some of the stuff you've done on your domain, I'm just going to have to assume you worked with the flash file a bit to find what the acceptance screen would look like.
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:18 pm
dolphinling wrote:
2) I got this two full days ago... I can't believe no one else has yet...
The "this" referred to, that he can't believe no one else has gotten yet, is that of a completed, new constellation.
Cue . . .
dolphinling wrote:But no, I haven't found any constellations, and I'm pretty sure you can't yet.
*sings* One of these things is not like the other, one of these things does not belong.
In other words: Huh?
If the screenshot you have is not a fake (and you say it isn't), and yet you yourself have not found any new constellations (and in fact think it's not possible yet) - then the only other thing I can think of is that someone at TNT gave you the screenshot - but then why in the world would you wonder why none of the rest of us have been able to do the same thing?
Which brings me back to huh?
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:25 pm
The "you've identified a new constellation" bit is rather interesting, no?
Does this mean that the constellations that appear on the TCGs are
for the purposes of the plot not yet recognized as such in Neopia? At
least until we "find" them? I mean, we're not talking completely different
constellations, are we? Hmmmmm?
Does this mean that the constellations that appear on the TCGs are
for the purposes of the plot not yet recognized as such in Neopia? At
least until we "find" them? I mean, we're not talking completely different
constellations, are we? Hmmmmm?
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:26 pm
Kamil wrote:If the screenshot you have is not a fake (and you say it isn't), and yet you yourself have not found any new constellations (and in fact think it's not possible yet) - then the only other thing I can think of is that someone at TNT gave you the screenshot - but then why in the world would you wonder why none of the rest of us have been able to do the same thing?
Which brings me back to huh?
Haha, no, in return for my bug reporting all I get is a warm fuzzy feeling, no hints or anything.
But no more hints about how I got it! Magic isn't magic if it's explained!
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:33 pm
I would imagine the "identified new constellation" means we will have to find coordinates to enter (similar to finding the parchments) in order to find a "new" constellation. Something we haven't seen before. I think the TCG's are just showing constellations that already exist. Understand?
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:33 pm
this plot is completly unrealistic. why would people see completely different stars when everyone is looking through the same kind of telescope in the same exact location?
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:34 pm
dolphinling wrote:Awww, I didn't mean to betray all your trust...
The screenshot's real and unedited, and that's the text you'll get. But no, I haven't found any constellations, and I'm pretty sure you can't yet. As for how I got the screenshot... I'll just let you all marvel at my amazingness
You've just singlehandedly set society back 100 years. There's no reason to believe anybody anymore.
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:36 pm
and if they already know where all the contellations are (and already seemingly have a book on all of them), why wouldn't they just tell us where the stupid things are instead of having us randomly try to guess what they are?
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:40 pm
-Ducky- wrote:and if they already know where all the contellations are (and already seemingly have a book on all of them), why wouldn't they just tell us where the stupid things are instead of having us randomly try to guess what they are?
Because then we'd all be moaning about not having a plot between LDP and the Haunted Woods - because thats what we're doing. We all have different skys for the same reason we all had different temples, to make us do some work on our own and not rely wholely on site like this one.
Also, on the subject of finding compleately new constelations: I disagree. Why are the Glyphs there if we don't have to find the homes for them? Also, it would be impossable to find any that we didn't have pictures for - the combinations within our scope would be enormous.
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:43 pm
farside wrote:You've just singlehandedly set society back 100 years. There's no reason to believe anybody anymore.
Haha, that made me laugh alot.
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:48 pm
hypothetically speaking, if we can't do nething else cuz TNT hasn't released it yet, wen was the last time sumthin 4 the plot was released? and the next news will b 2nite or 2moro nite?
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:54 pm
If we're going with how they've released stuff so far, the next chunk of plot will turn up next weekend.