Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:41 am
Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:49 am
anjuna wrote:Ria, I do appreciate it but if the images are individual without orientation, then you might better well spend your energy connecting stars in the sky (no offense TNT).Thanks, though!
Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:50 am
Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:53 am
riaherod wrote:I don't know what you mean - The oriantation is set within the .swf file, and is to scale. This is the simplest way to see the exact perspective of the constellations! Within the flash file there is an image that represents your telescope view - which is how I know they are to the right proportions. A lot of people have been having trouble with knowing exactly how large (or small) the constellations are in relation to the star maps!
Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:54 am
only_shades_of_grey wrote:Ok am I the only person who's star data has never changed I mean I went to the www74.neopets.com/(insert stardrivel here) and I still just got my regular star data nothing seems to change for me.
Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:56 am
anjuna wrote:riaherod wrote:I don't know what you mean - The oriantation is set within the .swf file, and is to scale. This is the simplest way to see the exact perspective of the constellations! Within the flash file there is an image that represents your telescope view - which is how I know they are to the right proportions. A lot of people have been having trouble with knowing exactly how large (or small) the constellations are in relation to the star maps!
The orientation of them individually or all together in one frame?
Such as in this: http://images6.theimagehosting.com/flash-stars.jpg
I just meant the pictures are arrangeed differently. Are they unique or all the same? Sorry if I am not understanding, I am really going to sleep now.
Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:58 am
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:00 am
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:01 am
anjuna wrote:Wow, great so this really does mean we each have our own file with 12 uniquely rearranged constellations, that hopefully match up to our map(s)?
By the way, for those that are wondering about the secondary elusive map, it may be a glitch, and some are checking on that. But if you are that curious, keep refreshing (making sure you receive new data each time in your browser) and you should eventually find a second data set and/or a second perspective from your Telescope view, not necessarily synced.
Do give us that Flash decompilation tutorial now, please!(Okay well not right now but by tomorrow would be nice).
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:01 am
Rayen wrote:only_shades_of_grey wrote:Ok am I the only person who's star data has never changed I mean I went to the www74.neopets.com/(insert stardrivel here) and I still just got my regular star data nothing seems to change for me.
No, I havn't seen a second map either. To be quite honest I'm getting rather confused about this whole "second map" thing!
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:07 am
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:10 am
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:35 am
Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:01 am
Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:31 am
farside wrote:Okay, let's test out this latter theory. I found my oil and rag behind Kelland the Thief. My coordinates file starts with (-100, -12, 1) and ends with (98, -266, 1). Anyone have the same?