Sun Oct 16, 2005 11:45 pm
Robert wrote:Bangel wrote:amarise wrote:VeraX-The real treat is inside.
I actually like this one, although it's a tad awkward. What I think it does is tie Dawn to the muffin. Like 'If you get to know Dawn, you'll discover all of her good, inner qualities, just like the sweetness of this muffin.'
*kasnort* I have no good inner qualities. ;P
Its true, she doesn't
Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:49 am
pattypus
Chocolaty Goodness
Spelling error, tsktsk.
Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:53 am
Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:44 am
the_dog_god-Delectable Desserts
Again, alliteration. Wink I like the idea, but the desserts part is actually a little boring. I know 'Delectable Delight' was already taken, but I would have liked to see something that was a little more descriptive.
Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:52 am
Mon Oct 17, 2005 4:03 am
Bangel wrote:It's chocolatey. Last I checked anyway...
Microsoft Word also mutilates Sapphire Faerie's name.
Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:23 am
Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:36 am
Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:50 am
Bangel wrote:Wind
Eat Me
Well that's very... blunt.It's short, and not the most original thing you could come up with, but it works well enough. Eat is so bland, though- devour or something like that would work better.
Mon Oct 17, 2005 12:48 pm
Twinkle wrote:
.:Requiem:.
Delectable Delight
I'm not at all happy with this one as I see it as a copy of TDG's work. Although you changed one word around, it's still blatant. Although the actual subtext is alright, it's not entirely your own work and it's too similar to TDG's to be a mistake.
My Eliminations are: Requiem, DM and Stephanie
Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:06 pm
Mon Oct 17, 2005 5:59 pm
Mon Oct 17, 2005 6:04 pm
Mon Oct 17, 2005 8:48 pm
Wind wrote:Bangel wrote:Wind
Eat Me
Well that's very... blunt. :P It's short, and not the most original thing you could come up with, but it works well enough. Eat is so bland, though- devour or something like that would work better.
Err... it was a reference to Alice in Wonderland :P
Mon Oct 17, 2005 11:28 pm