Tue Sep 27, 2005 5:57 pm
jeffwulf wrote:Fer is in the river library. The list of were all the scrolls are is listed below the pictures of the library. I missed them too.
Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:19 pm
skyfire wrote:I decided to do a little math. I picked a conservative number of 20 for the average number of handsful of sand-- last I'd seen the highest number of piles carried by someone was 60 (though there was quite enough time after for that to have changed significantly), but figured to err towards the assumption that more people had slower pets. So 20 seemed a safe bet.
Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:39 pm
As of June 2005, Neopets has registered more than 92 million accounts worldwide. Due to the multiple accounts that users create for a variety of reasons, this figure represents approximately 30 million individuals (by Company estimates).
Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:42 pm
Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:50 pm
Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:16 pm
skyfire wrote:I thought the number looked rather small considering the efforts folks were puting forth.
I decided to do a little math. I picked a conservative number of 20 for the average number of handsful of sand-- last I'd seen the highest number of piles carried by someone was 60 (though there was quite enough time after for that to have changed significantly), but figured to err towards the assumption that more people had slower pets. So 20 seemed a safe bet.
I took this and divided 104,034 by it and got ~5202 (5201.7). So with a conservative number of piles carried away, we only had 5200 people carrying? From all around the world? I found that difficult to believe (though it's feasable, I'm a skeptic).
I don't honestly know if my conservative number was too high, but if it's too low, that number of folks is even lower!
Which really leads me to two conclusions about 104,034: it's arbitrary or it's a clue.
Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:28 pm
skyfire wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:i had a three-hour wait time, only collected sand every now and then, and walked away with 14 piles. i consider my sand count to be amongst the lower numbers. seeing as so many people collected 40 or more, i'd say that your estimate might even be a little low! so i'd guess that there were even fewer diggers, based on that number.
which is why i think the number is a clue. the rest of the clue may not be released yet, however. you know how TNT is.
Yeah, that's why I wanted to go with an estimate leaning towards a lower number of piles. I figured it would give me a reasonable upper bound.
And considering the total number of piles, as well as the rough upper bound on how many folks contributed (whether carrying 1 pile or 100), seemed too small, I ruled out it being a genuine number of how many piles were /actually/ collected by players.
A new Lenny Conundrum competition has begun. The answer to last week's was 24,192 days. 2,304 people guessed the correct answer earning themselves 869 NP each.
Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:33 pm
Gitanesabr wrote:I have been to 9 of the clue rooms and still haven't found my scroll yet. I'm starting to get really worried I'll never find it and the plot will be over.
Just to confirm: are there 12 coloured shapes of my clue? That would leave me with 3 more possible doors to look behind.
jrtman wrote:Instead of whipping a number off the top of our heads let's do some averages:
3 hour wait time: 7 average
2.5 hour wait time: 10 average
2 hour wait time: 19 average
1.5 hour wait time: 33 average
1 hour wait time: 41 average
-------------------------------------------
7 + 10 + 19 + 33 + 41 / 5 = 22 average
Okay, so now we know a safe estimate is that the average player carried away 22 handfuls of sand during the repository dig.
Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:17 pm
Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:26 pm
jrtman wrote:skyfire wrote:I thought the number looked rather small considering the efforts folks were puting forth.
I decided to do a little math. I picked a conservative number of 20 for the average number of handsful of sand-- last I'd seen the highest number of piles carried by someone was 60 (though there was quite enough time after for that to have changed significantly), but figured to err towards the assumption that more people had slower pets. So 20 seemed a safe bet.
I took this and divided 104,034 by it and got ~5202 (5201.7). So with a conservative number of piles carried away, we only had 5200 people carrying? From all around the world? I found that difficult to believe (though it's feasable, I'm a skeptic).
I don't honestly know if my conservative number was too high, but if it's too low, that number of folks is even lower!
Which really leads me to two conclusions about 104,034: it's arbitrary or it's a clue.
Instead of whipping a number off the top of our heads let's do some averages:
3 hour wait time: 7 average
2.5 hour wait time: 10 average
2 hour wait time: 19 average
1.5 hour wait time: 33 average
1 hour wait time: 41 average
-------------------------------------------
7 + 10 + 19 + 33 + 41 / 5 = 22 average
Okay, so now we know a safe estimate is that the average player carried away 22 handfuls of sand during the repository dig.
104,034 / 22 = 4728 total people (rounded off).
Since only those who have translated their tablet, found their statue and read the correct scroll could participate in the dig this is a very believable number.
Also, let's not forget that roughly 39% of the people who would have been able to dig couldn't figure out the correct phrase or weren't online / quit participating in the plot due to the long wait times.
4728 * 39% = 1844 (rounded off)
4728 + 1844 = 6572 total players
To me 4,728 total diggers and 6,572 total players who have completed all the steps seems to be an acurate number, especially since there are still a lot of people who are still getting the tablet pieces.
I know we tend to think of these numbers in the millions, but we've seen it over and over that very few people have the ability to map their temple or follow clues even when people tell them how.
Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:27 pm
3 hour wait time: 7 average
Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:32 pm
stampsyne wrote:3 hour wait time: 7 average
I am curious on how this number was reached. I had a 3 hour wait and obtained 20 (and I was late at it because I had to wait 12 hours to re-read my scroll).
Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:35 pm
Chriso999 wrote:I have to say that I haven't finished my tablet but it still let me have sand.
Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:41 pm