Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:00 am
Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:31 am
Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:54 am
Twisted Sanity wrote:This is a really awesome idea actually!
If I had the spare NP around, I'd join in, but I've wasted most of it on training.
Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:43 am
Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:24 pm
_jaye_ wrote:Does it have to be in NPs? Can it be in another form...say, graphics?
Sun Jul 10, 2005 2:58 pm
_jaye_ wrote:Does it have to be in NPs? Can it be in another form...say, graphics?
(I meant prizes)
Sun Jul 10, 2005 3:01 pm
Sun Jul 10, 2005 3:16 pm
watericesage wrote:_jaye_ wrote:Does it have to be in NPs? Can it be in another form...say, graphics?
I would enter that set contest.
Sun Jul 10, 2005 5:55 pm
Sun Jul 10, 2005 6:24 pm
Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:33 pm
stampsyne wrote:Each competitor has 1 vote, but can vote for the first second, or third place of another contestant. I get one vote since I created the contest, unless there is an even number of competitors, then I get two!
Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:09 pm
Runevalkyrie wrote:stampsyne wrote:Each competitor has 1 vote, but can vote for the first second, or third place of another contestant. I get one vote since I created the contest, unless there is an even number of competitors, then I get two!
That seems a bit unfair to your partisipants. If you were to win one or more of the categories given your advantage, you're only going to give out 75% or less of the promised prizes (unless you make some sacrifice and give it to the runners up that's going to be changed in your rules "by whim".) Point being, it's for the contestants and not you to be a part of it besides being the host.
Another question, why exactly do you have a NP cap on prizes given out? If they choose to give out more, they should be able to (as we don't have any restrictions.)
Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:15 pm
cat1205123 wrote:Because if one person was giving out 800k in prizes, more people would enter their set contest than others.
Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:32 pm
Sun Jul 10, 2005 8:43 pm