Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:05 am
Whoa, that is scary 
! I guess we have to be sure we get a majority on something, whether it's an execution or a no execution 
! I guess we have to be sure we get a majority on something, whether it's an execution or a no execution
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:06 am
Fizzy wrote:Whoa, that is scary
Yeah, we can't let there be a non majority
Last edited by Robert on Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:06 am
YesItIsh wrote:Tat scares me. :O
I tot I taw a Puddy Tat!
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:06 am
hoooooooly poo.
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:07 am
Its the scary randomizer! Hide!
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:08 am
Guys? Let us cut down on the spam.
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:14 am
Good idea on spam cutting. Not too sure on what to think about the execution. On one hand it shows that anybody can be executed but ScottNak didn't say that it was randomly chosen...
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:15 am
the_dog_god wrote:Good idea on spam cutting. Not too sure on what to think about the execution. On one hand it shows that anybody can be executed but ScottNak didn't say that it was randomly chosen...
There's a president? *gasp*
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:15 am
the_dog_god wrote:Good idea on spam cutting. Not too sure on what to think about the execution. On one hand it shows that anybody can be executed but ScottNak didn't say that it was randomly chosen...
Isn't there some kind of a role that lets you select people to be randomly executed?
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:15 am
Yes cutting down on the spam would be a gud idea 
Woah what happened with the execution??? I didn't have the time to read through 10 pages again, but either that's one crazy randomizer scotts using, or someone can redirect executions again? Either way I don't think anyone is save unless there’s some kind of majority or something.
Woah what happened with the execution??? I didn't have the time to read through 10 pages again, but either that's one crazy randomizer scotts using, or someone can redirect executions again? Either way I don't think anyone is save unless there’s some kind of majority or something.
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:17 am
Oh great... all of that for nothing. >_> Oh well, tomorrow's another day I suppose. Looks like the baddie get's free kills tonight. :\
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:22 am
And the dreamers get to dream tonight too so it is not a complete loss.
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:23 am
That was close! Good Night Everyone!
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:28 am
cap wrote:And the dreamers get to dream tonight too so it is not a complete loss.
unless they end up killing the dreamer
I'd say we have our meaning to all for one or one for all quote...
if we not pick a maroity...then one of us will get it...
Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:34 am
His quote sounds a lot like the quote from "Full Metal Alchemist" the quote goes "one is all and all is one" and connection?