Fri Jun 25, 2004 10:30 pm
Christopher wrote:Runevalkyrie wrote:Christopher wrote:Evil Admin?
They're a collective now?
'We are the ADMIN. You will be assimilated. Resistance is inconvienient.'
It's probaby just me, but wouldn't it be "You will be banned" rather than "assimiliated"?
I was thinking more along then lines of you having to assimilate/devour members to stay operational but hey, your idea is good too.
I think I like the concent of the Admins assimilating us, seeing as that would technically mean they were turning us into Admins.....
Sat Jun 26, 2004 9:44 am
We've already got our own unofficial groups- The RPers. The Re-Stockers. The Monty Python Fanguy/Gals. The Reality TV Addicts.
The gang's all here.
The gang's all here.
Sat Jun 26, 2004 11:02 am
162 wrote:We've already got our own unofficial groups- The RPers. The Re-Stockers. The Monty Python Fanguy/Gals. The Reality TV Addicts.
The gang's all here.
Also, don't forget the Mischeif Makers (ASP & CCC).
And the Brits (You will be assimmilated. Your tea's and biscuits shall be added to ours. Resistance is not very good old chap)
And then theirs the Jokers and their sub-groups (the Badgers, the Kenya's, the 30 second bunnies etc.)
Sat Jun 26, 2004 2:43 pm
Ixistant wrote:162 wrote:We've already got our own unofficial groups- The RPers. The Re-Stockers. The Monty Python Fanguy/Gals. The Reality TV Addicts.
The gang's all here.
Also, don't forget the Mischeif Makers (ASP & CCC).
CCC's here and active (
), but unable to do anything. 
Mon Jun 28, 2004 10:40 am
The guys and the divas are back, and more recently the debating team.
Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:02 am
One way of preserving your post count is to make a mental note of it and add it onto your present post count if you really want to let everyone know how many posts you have. Only many people would not want to know how many posts you should have and wouldn't care.
Think of it as a challenge. How many people can point to their old post count and say, "Haha! Every single one of my [number] posts had some positive imput and was not in the least bit spammish!" I'm not sure how many of my posts were worthwhile and I take increasing care that my posts are contributive in some way. The problem with having a high post count is many people are on the verge of spamming to get there and eventually other members question the value of their posts.
It would be better to be respected in PPT rather than to be thought as "one of those spammers". At least that is my personal view on it.
Think of it as a challenge. How many people can point to their old post count and say, "Haha! Every single one of my [number] posts had some positive imput and was not in the least bit spammish!" I'm not sure how many of my posts were worthwhile and I take increasing care that my posts are contributive in some way. The problem with having a high post count is many people are on the verge of spamming to get there and eventually other members question the value of their posts.
It would be better to be respected in PPT rather than to be thought as "one of those spammers". At least that is my personal view on it.
Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:30 am
Lillie wrote:One way of preserving your post count is to make a mental note of it and add it onto your present post count if you really want to let everyone know how many posts you have. Only many people would not want to know how many posts you should have and wouldn't care.
Think of it as a challenge. How many people can point to their old post count and say, "Haha! Every single one of my [number] posts had some positive imput and was not in the least bit spammish!" I'm not sure how many of my posts were worthwhile and I take increasing care that my posts are contributive in some way. The problem with having a high post count is many people are on the verge of spamming to get there and eventually other members question the value of their posts.
It would be better to be respected in PPT rather than to be thought as "one of those spammers". At least that is my personal view on it.
Lillie, you had 10000+ posts and I wouldn't consider a single one spam, so don't nelittle yourself.
Mon Jun 28, 2004 2:21 pm
Christopher wrote:Lillie, you had 10000+ posts and I wouldn't consider a single one spam, so don't nelittle yourself.
WOW!!!!
I never realised anyone had that many posts before we lost PPT. I think I had about 50
Mon Jun 28, 2004 2:31 pm
Lillie wrote:One way of preserving your post count is to make a mental note of it and add it onto your present post count if you really want to let everyone know how many posts you have. Only many people would not want to know how many posts you should have and wouldn't care.
Think of it as a challenge. How many people can point to their old post count and say, "Haha! Every single one of my [number] posts had some positive imput and was not in the least bit spammish!" I'm not sure how many of my posts were worthwhile and I take increasing care that my posts are contributive in some way. The problem with having a high post count is many people are on the verge of spamming to get there and eventually other members question the value of their posts.
It would be better to be respected in PPT rather than to be thought as "one of those spammers". At least that is my personal view on it.
I had about 1,100 posts on the old one,
about 590 presently
Mon Jun 28, 2004 2:47 pm
I had between 2530-2535 posts at the time when we lost PPT.
Mon Jun 28, 2004 5:08 pm
arogance1 wrote:Christopher wrote:Lillie, you had 10000+ posts and I wouldn't consider a single one spam, so don't nelittle yourself.
WOW!!!!
ChromeFox had even more- around 12500 or so
I had just gotten into the BG range (2500) I had around 2650 when it crashed
Mon Jun 28, 2004 5:14 pm
I had 3000-3500 posts before the forum went down.
Mon Jun 28, 2004 7:48 pm
I had approximately 3300 posts before it went down, and there is a long way to go before I reach that again.
Mon Jun 28, 2004 8:00 pm
Robin wrote:arogance1 wrote:Christopher wrote:Lillie, you had 10000+ posts and I wouldn't consider a single one spam, so don't nelittle yourself.
WOW!!!!
ChromeFox had even more- around 12500 or so
I wasn't around for the 7 months or so when her post count astronomicalised, so I can not be sure about them.
Mon Jun 28, 2004 11:48 pm
Christopher wrote:Robin wrote:arogance1 wrote:Christopher wrote:Lillie, you had 10000+ posts and I wouldn't consider a single one spam, so don't nelittle yourself.
WOW!!!!
ChromeFox had even more- around 12500 or so
I wasn't around for the 7 months or so when her post count astronomicalised, so I can not be sure about them.
I like these new ones better, im about 3/4 of the way to 1000! And on the new forums, people like me.
Im on top of the posting list, I am on top of Dawn2 by one post 