Sun Nov 28, 2004 10:26 pm
wow great finds! man this is really confusing me
btw, how were you supposed to solve that lenny conundrum, how were u supposed to find the digiets?
MindyEdit: I've combined your posts for you. If you have something additional to add, please use the edit button in the upper right hand corner of your post.
Cath edit: thanks:) ok i'll edit posts if i have additional stuff from now on
btw, how were you supposed to solve that lenny conundrum, how were u supposed to find the digiets?
MindyEdit: I've combined your posts for you. If you have something additional to add, please use the edit button in the upper right hand corner of your post.
Cath edit: thanks:) ok i'll edit posts if i have additional stuff from now on
Last edited by this_is_cath on Fri Dec 03, 2004 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mon Nov 29, 2004 2:57 am
this_is_cath wrote:btw, how were you supposed to solve that lenny conundrum, how were u supposed to find the digiets?
http://www.neopets.com/newnt/index.phtm ... 89&week=78
Round 40. Neopets answer: 278116 Our answer: No solution, because the question statement has an error
In two consecutive conundrums, Neopets makes an error in the question statement. In this one, the solution is supposed to be that if all spaces are removed from the question statement, then the strings "two", "seven", "eight", "one", "one", and "six" can be found within the long string of concatenated words. The "two" comes from "bright woolen"; the "seven" comes from "pass even"; the "eight" supposedly comes from "the light" (but that actually gives "elight"); the first "one" comes from "shone"; the second "one" comes from "monotone"; the "six" comes from "six".
Anyway, as you can clearly see, Neopets never managed to spell "eight". They should have used a word like "weigh" or "sleigh" followed by a word that begins with the letter "t". Alternatively, they could have simply used one word, as in "height" or "freight".
Tue Nov 30, 2004 8:47 am
wahoooo more clues tomorrow 
Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:20 am
quetaypie wrote:wahoooo more clues tomorrow
why no clues???
Wed Dec 01, 2004 8:17 am
no clues again.. 
Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:00 am
Has anyone else noticed that the trophys for the Thieves side has names close to reguarding their profession? (bare with me ive never linked on pinkpt before.)
comes with trophy names of : Pickpocket, Apprentice Thief and Swindler
the image is of Sabatha.
Thats the only one I can link so far because I don't know what goes under Galem or Masila. The thing is the other trophys have thieves ive never seen before with names like: Bandit and Pilferer (Plushie Pilferer) maybe they could be in disguise of other neopets? lol
comes with trophy names of : Pickpocket, Apprentice Thief and Swindler
the image is of Sabatha.
Thats the only one I can link so far because I don't know what goes under Galem or Masila. The thing is the other trophys have thieves ive never seen before with names like: Bandit and Pilferer (Plushie Pilferer) maybe they could be in disguise of other neopets? lol
Sun Dec 05, 2004 5:03 am
Here are some suspicions I have. I've got a few, but I can't go sharing all of them now can I?
. . . card players are TWO FACED. Gashrok = two faces. Card Shark = Scarab 21 ^_^
. . . most everything about the mistress of doublecross can already be revealed.
. . . card players are TWO FACED. Gashrok = two faces. Card Shark = Scarab 21 ^_^
. . . most everything about the mistress of doublecross can already be revealed.
Sun Dec 05, 2004 6:10 am
I have a HUGE clue to do with the grundo but i cant say it hear as it will go around to quick. I may release it latter on.I cant reply to PM's since some person baned me for some reason that ive appologised for
Sun Dec 05, 2004 8:22 am
How is it a 'huge' clue?
Sun Dec 05, 2004 8:32 am
Sorry luckystar but you probally have nothing. Neopets hasn't updated this plot forever and there is nothing new out and probally wont be forever
Sun Dec 05, 2004 9:45 am
I also have CODES that im examing and comparing with neopets.com/thieves and the grundo plushie clue has somthing to do with a user lookup
Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:50 am
I thought the point was that we all discuss our finds?
You can't keep infomation to yourself then use everyone elses clues aand finds....
that's my opinion anyway.
You can't keep infomation to yourself then use everyone elses clues aand finds....
that's my opinion anyway.
Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:56 am
*points up* What she said.
It's highly unlikely that you have legit 'codes'. Others would have found them, if they do indeed exist.
Neo hasn't done anything to update the plot. Therefore, there's likely to be no clues whatsoever.
If you think you do have a 'huge clue', by all means go ahead and post to prove me wrong
It's highly unlikely that you have legit 'codes'. Others would have found them, if they do indeed exist.
Neo hasn't done anything to update the plot. Therefore, there's likely to be no clues whatsoever.
If you think you do have a 'huge clue', by all means go ahead and post to prove me wrong
Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:59 am
Alex wrote:*points up* What she said.
It's highly unlikely that you have legit 'codes'. Others would have found them, if they do indeed exist.
Neo hasn't done anything to update the plot. Therefore, there's likely to be no clues whatsoever.
If you think you do have a 'huge clue', by all means go ahead and post to prove me wrong
Yeah, I don't see how only one person who have found a big clue. I keep seeing things but then realise they are not part of the plot, I have then written down though. I don't think I can even find my chaart it's been so long since the clues
Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:18 pm
Remember to be careful with userlookup clues. Neopets will use old accounts and ive seen a few false 'clue' accounts going around. (sorry if i'm stating the obvious, its midnght and I just watched Saw )
)