Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:45 pm
I can actually see that in the future.
Tue Jun 21, 2005 6:14 pm
I couldn't match the fonts, and it's quick and rather ugly, but this is what came to mind.
I wasn't even nasty to Doug this time. I think I'm getting soft.
I wasn't even nasty to Doug this time. I think I'm getting soft.
Tue Jun 21, 2005 7:12 pm
Anybody got that TCG card with good old dougie on it?
Tue Jun 21, 2005 7:34 pm
That's awful and yet a bit funny. I hope that we don't see ay ripple effects on the site except for good ones. I just worry about these big comanies and Neopets turning into a *shiver* Pokemon of the internet
Tue Jun 21, 2005 7:57 pm
There you go
Tue Jun 21, 2005 8:21 pm
Is anyone really that surprised? 
Tue Jun 21, 2005 8:47 pm
"The hidden value of
NeoPets is the fact that over 60% of its audience is over age 13, which
aligns with the audiences of many of our MTV Network brands."
Thank God that they recognise it's not a children's site. I think this is a pretty good sign.
I sense an influx of new users and more premium spots opening up somehow.
NeoPets is the fact that over 60% of its audience is over age 13, which
aligns with the audiences of many of our MTV Network brands."
Thank God that they recognise it's not a children's site. I think this is a pretty good sign.
I sense an influx of new users and more premium spots opening up somehow.
Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:18 pm
I found this somewhere, have no idea who maded it 
Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:35 pm
aliboy wrote:
There you go
Hehe gets me every time
Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:41 pm
I have been reading and taking on board all the posts so far...
More adverts I could live with and more sponsor games would be ok.
I think the main sites that would be targeted would be those that use graphics from Neopets (neoitems and neocolours spring to mind).
If they don't make it completely pay-to-play they could transfer a lot of the current content to premium access only (and increase the premium charges), which could leave the free-access content very limited (and probably pointless).
This is just personal opinion and I know I will probably be shot down for saying it, so sorry in advance.
More adverts I could live with and more sponsor games would be ok.
Illyria wrote:viacom is known for shutting fansites down
I think the main sites that would be targeted would be those that use graphics from Neopets (neoitems and neocolours spring to mind).
If they don't make it completely pay-to-play they could transfer a lot of the current content to premium access only (and increase the premium charges), which could leave the free-access content very limited (and probably pointless).
This is just personal opinion and I know I will probably be shot down for saying it, so sorry in advance.
Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:00 pm
All these graphics are hillarious.
We're so awful...
We're so awful...
Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:29 pm
matterbug wrote:All these graphics are hillarious.
We're so awful...
Hey, mine wasn't so cruel this time.
Tue Jun 21, 2005 11:25 pm
Is this the Viacom after the split, or will CBS Corporation eventually own it?
Wed Jun 22, 2005 4:28 am
With the hope of not being attacked i'm going to ask this one thing: Why does everyone hate Doug?
Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:07 am
Atjj wrote:With the hope of not being attacked i'm going to ask this one thing: Why does everyone hate Doug?
He's a pig, that's why. >>;
He's basically really money-hungry; his influence got us banner ads, sponser thingymajigs, and a decline of the Neopets we remember and want.