Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:27 pm
yes i did, i just cant find it even now. I'm thick at all this constellation stuff
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:27 pm
JhasNeeh wrote:Firstly, Musi, please edit your StarData so it doesn't take me half an hour scrolling to see a line of text.
Secondly, I hate to burst everyones bubble, but I have to agree with those that don't think that irregular hexagon is the dancer, because the glyph is a regular hexagon. I'vbe just gone through the 25 or so pages that have been added since last night and you all seem so sure - but from the facts that we have found from the telescope, you seem to be barkibng up the wrong tree.
My opinion is that TNT have added that shape just to wind you up, looks like it's worked.
maybe, but i beleive that it is the corect one becauseive noticed while searching for diffrent constilatios that i can usually find the constellation but with only 2 star missing, this happen 3 times i think trying to find the first to rise. also i can comfirm that that this is probobly a constellation because the numbers erperating the stars distence very by a multiple of ten, in every constilation so far. just a couple of reasons why i feel it is the correct constellation
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:36 pm
stoodder wrote:JhasNeeh wrote:Firstly, Musi, please edit your StarData so it doesn't take me half an hour scrolling to see a line of text.
Secondly, I hate to burst everyones bubble, but I have to agree with those that don't think that irregular hexagon is the dancer, because the glyph is a regular hexagon. I'vbe just gone through the 25 or so pages that have been added since last night and you all seem so sure - but from the facts that we have found from the telescope, you seem to be barkibng up the wrong tree.
My opinion is that TNT have added that shape just to wind you up, looks like it's worked.
maybe, but i beleive that it is the corect one becauseive noticed while searching for diffrent constilatios that i can usually find the constellation but with only 2 star missing, this happen 3 times i think trying to find the first to rise. also i can comfirm that that this is probobly a constellation because the numbers erperating the stars distence very by a multiple of ten, in every constilation so far. just a couple of reasons why i feel it is the correct constellation
Had it ever occured to you that TNT were watching us and added it for a laugh? It wouldn't be the first time. The Glyphs are in there for a reason and it doesn't match what everyone is finding.
thanks
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:38 pm
thanks for doing that for me kronk but it says that its not correct it says constellation could not be found. 
panicking
panicking
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:41 pm
again with the "glyphs!" Please explain what this is
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:42 pm
musikitamanga wrote:no its ok i realised what to do
Please, read the forum rules. They aren't too hard to follow but you seem intent on not bothering.
Updates?
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:43 pm
Am I correct in that NPT has been updating things around 12ish NST?
Just checking.
Just checking.
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:44 pm
pinkflamingonewsgirl wrote:again with the "glyphs!" Please explain what this is
Sorry. The Glyphs are a set of pictures that were found embedding into the telescope. They are the pictures that show up on your sky once you've found their constellation. IE the eyes and the dreamer.
They have been posted, but it would help if they were put into the first post. Mods?
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:44 pm
Aside from possibly taking all the "Where's Waldo?" fun for later on away from themselves, where's the harm in their speculations?
Re: Updates?
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:46 pm
silhouette169 wrote:Am I correct in that NPT has been updating things around 12ish NST?
Just checking.
What do you mean by NPT? I can only assume the news, which never updates at 12 NST, but rather anywhere between 4pm and 8pm, NST. Normally right in the middle though.
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:46 pm
Thanks JhasNeeh! It was getting frustrating trying to follow what people were talking about. I've been following this thread since the beginning and it finally got to me. Sorry if I sounded harsh. 
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:47 pm
pinkflamingonewsgirl wrote:Thanks JhasNeeh! It was getting frustrating trying to follow what people were talking about. I've been following this thread since the beginning and it finally got to me. Sorry if I sounded harsh.
No problem, I had seen your request a few pages back but forgotten about it by the time I got up to date.
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:47 pm
pinkflamingonewsgirl wrote:again with the "glyphs!" Please explain what this is
http://www.hidebehind.com/2391E500
Re: Updates?
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:48 pm
JhasNeeh wrote:silhouette169 wrote:Am I correct in that NPT has been updating things around 12ish NST?
Just checking.
What do you mean by NPT? I can only assume the news, which never updates at 12 NST, but rather anywhere between 4pm and 8pm, NST. Normally right in the middle though.
My apologies - I meant the Neopets Team updating plot items.
Re: Updates?
Fri Mar 31, 2006 6:50 pm
silhouette169 wrote:JhasNeeh wrote:silhouette169 wrote:Am I correct in that NPT has been updating things around 12ish NST?
Just checking.
What do you mean by NPT? I can only assume the news, which never updates at 12 NST, but rather anywhere between 4pm and 8pm, NST. Normally right in the middle though.
My apologies - I meant the Neopets Team updating plot items.
No problem, that has so far always updated with the news.
EDIT: Just for future reference, the Neopets team is normally shortened to TNT.