[[Week 8]] Every PPTer has their price...

[TDG]

Nah nah nah nah nah nah nah nah - po-oll!

Every week, I will post a new question, asking you if you would scam an account in order to obtain something desirable. Please note that no matter how absurd it may seem, you will get away with scamming that account.

• Scam - To get into somebody's account and make it so the person it rightfully belongs to can no longer access it (No matter what, the person cannot retrieve anything from the former account)
• Account - One other than yours which belongs to an innocent bystander (unless stated otherwise) who you do not know. (IE : Not your worst enemy)
• Something desirable - You will only receive what the question states you will. If the question is "Would you scam Borovan's account for 2 NP", even though Borovan has more than 2 Neopoints, you would only receive those two neopoints.
• Get away with scamming that account - Even if there is undeniable proof that you scammed tha person, you will not be frozen, warned, exposed as the scammer, nobody would know you did it and any negative reprecussions of you scamming that account will not affect you
  
  (EG : In Week 5, all idiots/spammers/scammers etc would be frozen. If you were a spammer/scammer/idiot, you personally would not be frozen for scamming the account in question)

Results from week 1 : For 100,000 NP, 28% of the voters would scam an account
Results from week 2 : For 1,000,000 NP 36% of the voters would scam an account
Results from week 3 : For complete moderation powers over the neoboards, only 25% of the voters would scam an account
Results from week 4 : For the pet of their dreams, only 12% of the voters would scam an account
Results from week 5 : To remove all scammers, spammers, idiots etc from Neopets, 70% of the voters would scam an account
Results from week 6 : For a one of a kind trophy, 18% of people would scam an account
Results from week 7 : To watch them squirm, 37% of people would scam their worst enemy's account


---------------------------------------------------

This week's question :

(Inspired by last week's question)

• Would you scam the 12 month old account of your best friend, allowing you to give them items and making you look like the good guy/gal ??

AS ALWAYS, DO NOT PUBLICALLY REVEAL WHO YOU VOTED FOR. Please don't check the results before you vote, I want honest opinions, not influenced by what others have said

[Pardona]

Interesting to say the least. Now, yes or no aside, which Catwoman did you have in mind when you made the poll? Michelle Pfeiffer or Halle Berry?

[Pudding]

That's a really interesting question. I never would have thought of that situation.

The results are pretty telling this week, though. Great poll, as always.

[TDG]

Interesting to say the least. Now, yes or no aside, which Catwoman did you have in mind when you made the poll? Michelle Pfeiffer or Halle Berry?

Neither, but now you've brought it up - Halle Berry.

Have to say, the recent Catwoman was just plain bad. Especially the "Purrrrrrrfect Idea" bit. And seriously, a villain planning to release the evils of makeup upon the world ??

[Pardona]

Exactly. Halle Berry is bad acting, and Jim Carrey is good acting (not very familiar with the old movies and series). I'm surprised the 'yes' actually got a single vote.

[KrypticLogik]

umm... why would you need to scam an account to give them items? aslong as you know their username you can give them items whenever you want.

[_jade_em_]

umm... why would you need to scam an account to give them items? aslong as you know their username you can give them items whenever you want.

Yes, but the point is, if their account is hacked, they'll be really upset, and if you give them everything they've lost, they'll appreciate what you're doing and be forever grateful xD

[Pardona]

As Doc Holliday said in the '93 western 'Tombstone': 'My hypocricy only goes so far'.

[Alex]

*votey votey vote!*

Wow, the results are interesting o.o