For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:19 pm

Katherine wrote:I'd like to see some evidence on Byakuya San

Vote: Ammer
Move: Rivendell


Wait, wait.

I don't understand your vote.

You claim you want evidence on Byakuya San yet when countless people have posted saying that my role makes sense, and have unvoted me, you don't consider that evidence in my favour?

I'm not saying you should vote for Byakuya San as I think he is telling the truth about his role, but I find your logic to be extremely faulty.

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:23 pm

Voting Update:
Pixa (1) - DM
Ammer (4) - Ooga, Rubywinged, Byakuya San, Katherine
Byakuya San (2) - Rubywinged, loser
DM (1) - May

Players still in Middle-Earth: 20 Majority Single: 11 Majority Double: 15

Locations:
the Shire:
Bree: Byakuya San
Rivendell: loser, Rubywinged, Ammer, Katherine
Moria:
Lothlórien: May
Isengard: DM, Ooga
Fangorn Forest:
Minas Tirith:
Helm's Deep:
Mordor:

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:40 pm

May wrote:Vote: DM - for staying in Isengard the whole game... 'tis a bad place


But the hobbits are here! :o

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:48 pm

We are far enough in the game with probably more evils left then innocents that I really can't see just waiting around to find out if someone is innocent or not when they are suspected as evil. I mean we could all wake up dead tomorrow that'd be bad.

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:58 pm

Rubywinged wrote:We are far enough in the game with probably more evils left then innocents that I really can't see just waiting around to find out if someone is innocent or not when they are suspected as evil. I mean we could all wake up dead tomorrow that'd be bad.


Well, with that logic is it fair if I cast my vote for you?

I could use the same "I can't wait for any evidence" line and according to you, I would be justified.

There is no point in casting votes against people if you're unsure about their role. Besides, judging from executions, Mongrel and malibu were executed because they gave bad defenses. Jas admitted her role.

We didn't blindly vote for them. We waited for evidence or an otherwise unconvincing defense.

I don't know about y'all, but throughout this game, I've taken the time to see the evidence on people before I had cast my vote. I'd rather execute someone I know is a baddie rather than execute someone else I think is a baddie and not have it work out.

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Sun Nov 09, 2008 9:47 pm

I think you're misinterpreting what i said. What I meant was that if someone whom I've talked to previously and i know has told me the truth about other evils be it one way or another be said person living or now dead and information passed on. If that person has told me that 'so n so' is evil why would i wait for 'so n so' to prove they are then innocent? I have info from a source that has so far proved to be reliable why would I not vote for 'so n so' Waiting would only put more people in danger of being killed off if that person is evil.

Hopefully that makes since.

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:38 pm

Location: Moria

Vote: Byakuya San


So far all the information from ruby has been correct, i don't see any reason not to believe this information too.

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:03 pm

Right now I'm on the fence about Ammer...he was dreamed evil, but has been able to defend himself, I will hold off on voting for him for now, unless someone has more info about him being evil.

Vote: Byakuya San
Location: Fangorn Forest

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:10 pm

I'm still on the fence for Byakuya San, but I figure since he had no hesitation in voting for me, I should return the favour.

Vote: Byakuya San

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:13 pm

Vote: Byakuya San
Location: Lorien


I'm about to go to sleep now, but if we have to execute someone I'd rather it be Byakuya than Ammer.

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:34 pm

Oh and since i've spoken out what feels like alot today I just want to state that all information I've stated has been given TO me am not a dreamer of any sort or a detective type of any sort! I'm just stating this so people understand that what I'm saying could infact be wrong but my contact hasnt been wrong yet that i've noticed so I'm gunna trust them.

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:58 pm

Vote: Byakuya San

Move to Bree

Hope your not leading us astray.

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:29 am

:/ Well, some people did seem unsure, but if we're always going to stall stall stall, we're going to lose anyway... and I need to go to bed.

Vote: Byakuya San
Vote: DM
Move: Lothlórien

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:43 am

Vote: Byakuya

Re: WW36: Battle for Middle-Earth Game Thread

Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:48 am

Vote: Byakuya San
Move: Minas Tirith

...meh. I'm confused. D:
Topic locked