Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:18 pm
laq wrote:o_0 wrote::P I am extremely positive that your role is a baddie, or a dreamer, a protector, a regular innocent, or a neutral character.
That sums it up pretty well. I'm one of those for sure!
Bingo. I win.
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:19 pm
Vote: o_0
Should I explain why?
He needed a shield, his days are counted.
About legoguilt, I'm unsure. He resurrected only one person, and after we asked. I suggest someone should check him.
Should I explain why?
He needed a shield, his days are counted.
About legoguilt, I'm unsure. He resurrected only one person, and after we asked. I suggest someone should check him.
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:19 pm
o_0 wrote:laq wrote:o_0 wrote::P I am extremely positive that your role is a baddie, or a dreamer, a protector, a regular innocent, or a neutral character.
That sums it up pretty well. I'm one of those for sure!
Bingo. I win.
ur d3duction skilz r at t3h sme lav3l as sharlok holmas1!!! OMG
Wind, legoguilt says that all his resurrections have been used up, and I'm inclinded to believe him. His explanation is very logical, considering what happend.
Why are you guys voting for me? I revived our dreamer, and o_0 stole my role(or someone did) and used it to revive me, so now I am out of revivals.
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:41 pm
vote: o_0
can someone tell me why legoquilt is being voted for? I thought she was good..
can someone tell me why legoquilt is being voted for? I thought she was good..
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:43 pm
warxelo wrote:vote: o_0
can someone tell me why legoquilt is being voted for? I thought she was good..
She is a he.
Most of the votes are bandwagon votes also.
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:46 pm
warxelo wrote:vote: o_0
can someone tell me why legoquilt is being voted for? I thought she was good..
He was converted, or suspected of being converted? I think? Someone help me here.
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:48 pm
Caesara wrote:warxelo wrote:vote: o_0
can someone tell me why legoquilt is being voted for? I thought she was good..
He was converted, or suspected of being converted? I think? Someone help me here.
That's the suspect... but I guess most people just bandwagon.
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:49 pm
Yeah, I find it stupid that you're voting for him. He's innocent, as was revealed when he died. He revived one of your dreamers; what more can you ask of him?
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:52 pm
o_0 wrote:Yeah, I find it stupid that you're voting for him. He's innocent, as was revealed when he died. He revived one of your dreamers; what more can you ask of him?
He is connected to you. I believe someone in the dead thread mentioned that if someone revives someone than they'll be part of their lifeline. So if lego dies, the life line will be cut and you'll die.
I know I'm not connected to lego because I'd be informed of it by Scott. But considering lego revived me, I won't vote for him.
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:53 pm
Ammer wrote:o_0 wrote:Yeah, I find it stupid that you're voting for him. He's innocent, as was revealed when he died. He revived one of your dreamers; what more can you ask of him?
He is connected to you. I believe someone in the dead thread mentioned that if someone revives someone than they'll be part of their lifeline. So if lego dies, the life line will be cut and you'll die.
I know I'm not connected to lego because I'd be informed of it by Scott. But considering lego revived me, I won't vote for him.
Which just goes to show you how crazy the groupies are.
I am trying to kill all the baddies because I didn't want what happened to -Ducky- to happen. xD I wanna be in control of the random killings at night.
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:54 pm
As Jas said in the dead thread, why are we voting for Lego? You guys agreed you wouldn't vote for him if he revived one of the dreamers -- at least for today. Give the guy a brake.
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:58 pm
o_0 wrote:Yeah, I find it stupid that you're voting for him. He's innocent, as was revealed when he died. He revived one of your dreamers; what more can you ask of him?
You're voting for him yourself.
You're playing both sides again.
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:58 pm
I only voted to prove he wasn't on my side.
Sun Feb 27, 2005 12:08 am
Jasujo wrote:Hi.
I think it's very uncool of people to be voting for legoquilt. You made a deal with him that if he revived someone you'd believe he was good and not vote for him. He came through and revived Ammer, but you turned on legoquilt and didn't keep your word. What's with that?
(lol right thread this time
I must have missed that in the last thread. And now that I know that this deal was made and people are breaking it, I'm angry. I personally think everyone voting for Legoquilt should withdraw their vote, at least for today.
And I honestly feel he's innocent anyway.
Edit: And tommorow, I don't think you'll have to worry about people voting for you.
Sun Feb 27, 2005 12:56 am
I didn't know that deal was made and since it was, we should keep our promise. It isn't fair to him.
unvote: legoquilt
unvote: legoquilt