Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:45 pm
You give me your evidence, Pixa, and I will change my tune. It is severely possible I have been mislead, and if you have evidence, I would like to know about it. Rather desperately. In supporting Jamie, I know that I will become prime target if he is evil, because I have trust. If you do have evidence to give me, I really would appreciate it. Otherwise, I will not vote.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:49 pm
Pixa wrote:I'm the gossiper, if you really must know.
*watches self die*
Pixa wrote:I'd revive Maggie, Vigilante with unused kills is always good.
I don't really think I can get more specific. I receive some information on a random event of the night. Last night, I found out you killed TDG.
Khristian wrote:Vote: Jamie
Pixal told me his role from day 1. He even proved it by telling me about something I did one night.
I trust him.
Well, there is all the evidence. I'm wondering what Jamie said his role was, personally. That could narrow it down further.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:51 pm
Jamie's probably asleep, his time. I will reveal what he told me his role was soon, probably.
Pixa, I don't see how that is evidence. If you know that Jamie killed TDG last night, and yet you knew who he was from Day One, why did you not say so earlier?
Pixa, I don't see how that is evidence. If you know that Jamie killed TDG last night, and yet you knew who he was from Day One, why did you not say so earlier?
Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:53 pm
Anubis wrote:Jamie's probably asleep, his time. I will reveal what he told me his role was soon, probably.
Pixa, I don't see how that is evidence. If you know that Jamie killed TDG last night, and yet you knew who he was from Day One, why did you not say so earlier?
Khristian knew who I was on day one. Later on, I found some gossip of what happened with him. I asked him about it, and I was right, even though I did not know what happened from him.
If that makes sense, trying not to be too specific.
If you reveal the role, it could help lead us to a swifter conclusion.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:55 pm
Jamie is Australlian.
Pixa - you've alrady told us your role, could you tell us if your role has a specific name? That helps us increase your validity
Pixa - you've alrady told us your role, could you tell us if your role has a specific name? That helps us increase your validity
Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:01 pm
Doesn't really make sense to meh. =P
Right.
Jamie told me that he was Dr. Nick Riviera. He told me that he could protect someone every night. Now, Nick isn't that good a doctor, is he? Jamie told me that he had 75% chance of successful protection.
What if the other 25% was death? What if, if Nick failed to protect, he killed whoever it was he was trying to protect?
Now, I don't know this for sure. It's a theory of mine. Jamie's role sounded convincing enough to me.
Pixa wrote:If you reveal the role, it could help lead us to a swifter conclusion.
Right.
Jamie told me that he was Dr. Nick Riviera. He told me that he could protect someone every night. Now, Nick isn't that good a doctor, is he? Jamie told me that he had 75% chance of successful protection.
What if the other 25% was death? What if, if Nick failed to protect, he killed whoever it was he was trying to protect?
Now, I don't know this for sure. It's a theory of mine. Jamie's role sounded convincing enough to me.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:35 pm
Anubis wrote:Doesn't really make sense to meh. =PPixa wrote:If you reveal the role, it could help lead us to a swifter conclusion.
Right.
Jamie told me that he was Dr. Nick Riviera. He told me that he could protect someone every night. Now, Nick isn't that good a doctor, is he? Jamie told me that he had 75% chance of successful protection.
What if the other 25% was death? What if, if Nick failed to protect, he killed whoever it was he was trying to protect?
Now, I don't know this for sure. It's a theory of mine. Jamie's role sounded convincing enough to me.
Hm, that would possibly make sense. Now that I think about it, Jamie could be good.
I'll hold off my vote.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:52 pm
Ammer wrote:Anubis wrote:Doesn't really make sense to meh. =PPixa wrote:If you reveal the role, it could help lead us to a swifter conclusion.
Right.
Jamie told me that he was Dr. Nick Riviera. He told me that he could protect someone every night. Now, Nick isn't that good a doctor, is he? Jamie told me that he had 75% chance of successful protection.
What if the other 25% was death? What if, if Nick failed to protect, he killed whoever it was he was trying to protect?
Now, I don't know this for sure. It's a theory of mine. Jamie's role sounded convincing enough to me.
Hm, that would possibly make sense. Now that I think about it, Jamie could be good.
I'll hold off my vote.
Hmmm, yes, it does make sense... It would have been nice if he told us earlier...
Then again, it does seem a good cover-up...
*thinks about it*
Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:00 pm
Perhaps now you know, Pixa, why I am ready to defend him, in light of my theory. You say that he killed TDG, it might well be true, but Jamie could still be an innocent due to awful doctoring (:P). You say he killed TDG, yes, but that doesn't make him evil if my theory is right.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:10 pm
Gonna hold off on my vote for now, im a little confused. It's kinda weird how a lot of people seem to have "proof" of everything, but we dont see too much proof anywhere.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:55 pm
Thats a good Role for Dr. Nick, but it is possible that it is a cover up, but a well thought out one. I am going to hold off my vote and see if Jamie is going to say anything.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:32 pm
Robert wrote:Thats a good Role for Dr. Nick, but it is possible that it is a cover up, but a well thought out one. I am going to hold off my vote and see if Jamie is going to say anything.
Jamie might be asleep until execution. I don't remember when executions are my time, and when he'll be awake my time.
Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:41 pm
A bit of advice - don't base ANY decisions completely on trust 
Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:42 pm
I don't know... it seems strange to have a protector like Gemma who didn't seem to have a failure rate, and then a protector that isn't a perfect healer. We haven't been told exactly what Gemma's role did, but it seems strange to have another healer that doesn't match up the other one...
Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:48 pm
Anoohilator wrote:A bit of advice - don't base ANY decisions completely on trust
WW is a lying game. Of course I don't. But, to me, and to a few others, Jamie's role seems semi-convincing, at least.
Kuge... I don't know about that, to be honest, but Nick wouldn't be a perfect healer, would he?