For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 4:00 pm

Matterbug wrote:We really need to execute another baddie today.

My suspicions:

Penguin, Twizzler, Susan, DM

There are only two baddies dead. Chances are many/all of the people on that list are baddies.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 4:10 pm

Dyl wrote:
Matterbug wrote:We really need to execute another baddie today.

My suspicions:

Penguin, Twizzler, Susan, DM

There are only two baddies dead. Chances are many/all of the people on that list are baddies.


Yeah, I'm not sure whether there are two or three baddies on each team. If they've all got a shield that big though, we're screwed.

Susan, you could show your loyalty by using that kill on someone else. XD

Who do you guys think we should go with?

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 5:09 pm

I already sent my role to Roxas and I can prove my role.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 5:41 pm

Twizz is a no-no.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 5:56 pm

I'm safe. Roxas will be able to prove it to you later on.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:08 pm

Roxas by a "no-no" does that mean he's suspicious and we should vote for him?

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:09 pm

I meant the exact opposite. >.<

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:22 pm

Twizz is also a female. ;)

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 6:57 pm

Well, if all of this is true, pretty much everyone in the game is claiming they are an innocent and can prove their role. XD

Obviously some people are lying.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 7:07 pm

I have some suspicions. Penguin, your role seems too much like one of my rolepowers. I doubt what you told me is the only thing you can do.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 7:57 pm

Matterbug, having two daykill sp's? Could be plausible.


Those were both given to me by one of the other innocents.

I have to say Penguin and Susan are the ones I'm most suspicious of. Penguin seemed very hesitant to vote Light, and I realize his reasoning was the whole new player thing, but I'm still not totally convinced. A neutral role is one very easy to fake, and Susan seemed quick to get attention to other players whenever she was brought up.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:03 pm

Matterbug wrote:
Dyl wrote:
Matterbug wrote:We really need to execute another baddie today.

My suspicions:

Penguin, Twizzler, Susan, DM

There are only two baddies dead. Chances are many/all of the people on that list are baddies.


Yeah, I'm not sure whether there are two or three baddies on each team. If they've all got a shield that big though, we're screwed.

Susan, you could show your loyalty by using that kill on someone else. XD

Who do you guys think we should go with?



Give me a name Matt and it's done.

Well, if Twizz is cleared, then that leaves Penguin and DM. I'll start the vote?

Vote: Penguin

Also could the third person on the Dominion team be a convert? Then they would be able to prove their roles but still be evil.

And Matt, I always point out suspicious people in any WW game I play, always makes people think i'm evil. I've been executed innocent a few times for it. But of course, the next game I play, if I don't do that people will be suspicious cause it's not like me.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:10 pm

Well, Matt's reasoning plus my own equals Vote: Penguin

Pandas are better anyway.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:11 pm

@ Miyu: Picked it up when TOSO died.

Re: WW 27: Q, Jr's Playground

Sat Aug 25, 2007 8:40 pm

Vote: Penguin

I think it's our best lead at the moment.

Although I really do like penguins.
Topic locked